Threading accuracy?

Threading accuracy?

Home › Forums › General Questions › Threading accuracy?

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #869303
    Andrew Tinsley
    Participant
      @andrewtinsley63637

      All the textbooks and experienced people say screw cut threads. Dies are not as good (accurate?). I well believe this statement, but nowhere can I find any quantitative data that shows how much poorer (less accurate?) are threads that are cut using dies.

      Does anyone have any idea? I am just curious that nowhere can I find such a comparison.

      Andrew.

      #869307
      Pete
      Participant
        @pete41194

        I doubt there’s any real numbers available since there’s so many variables including the quality and accuracy of whatever die is being used, if it’s a solid or adjustable die. A new quality die, highly worn, or one where the rust has to be scrubbed off it first? Then how it’s guided or kept square to the work. There’s still many times where a die cut thread is adequate or good enough for the purpose. It can also be difficult to single point a lot of the small thread sizes we might use. Model size studs as just one example.

        #869308
        JasonB
        Moderator
          @jasonb

          Probably as many variables when screw cutting – Worn leadscrew, grind of the cutting tool & tip, full or partial insert, work deflection, depth of cut, operator. exact pitch or near enough with small %age error, etc

          #869314
          old mart
          Participant
            @oldmart

            A lot depends whether the die suits the material being threaded. I always open up split dies as much as possible for a first cut and then close up slightly for subsequent passes until the female part screws on with minimum slop. Assuming there is a female part that can be used as a gauge. The finish is rarely as good as screwcut threads, but normally good enough for government work.

            I remember an apprentice cutting a 3/8 BSF thread about 6″ long bringing it to me and I had never seen such a long drunken thread before. I did explain what had gone wrong and he never repeated that mistake.

            #869321
            Clive Foster
            Participant
              @clivefoster55965

              I suspect that threads produced with a Coventry or similar die-head are likely to be more accurate than anything screw-cut on a lathe of unknown history.

              It is said that the quality of long die-cut thread suffers due to simultaneous variation in cutting forces and the force needed to pul the die along the three. With a spring loaded die head, like the Coventry system, thread cutting and traverse forces are essentially constant.

              Feeding via the feed screw rather than by hand is likely to be best. Which is what I usually do if its a thread on the QC box. It helps that my S&B 1024 is metric and my P&W B is imperial so most things can be easily covered. Except 19 tpi.

              Nailing down specifications is pretty difficult but Wikipedia AI says :-

              The American Standards for Accuracy of Engine and Toolroom Lathes (ASA) says typical lead errors fall into the following ranges: [1]

              1. Cumulative Lead Error (Linear Accuracy)
              This measures the cumulative error over a specific length of the screw, usually measured per foot (300 mm): [1, 2]
              Toolroom Lathes (High Precision): Maximum allowable error of ±0.0010 inches per foot (≈ 0.025 mm per 300 mm).
              Engine Lathes (Standard Industrial): Maximum allowable error of ±0.0015 inches per foot (≈ 0.038 mm per 300 mm).
              Hobbyist / Inexpensive Lathes: Typically range from ±0.002 to ±0.005 inches per foot (≈ 0.05 to 0.12 mm per 300 mm), as these leadscrews are typically thread-rolled rather than precision-ground.[1, 2]

              2. Short-Distance / Incremental Variance
              This measures local pitch errors over a short span to catch quick fluctuations or “drunken” threads: [1, 2]
              Toolroom Lathes: Max variance of ±0.0004 inches in any 4-inch span (≈ 0.01 mm per 100 mm).
              Engine Lathes: Max variance of ±0.0005 inches in any 4-inch span (≈ 0.012 mm per 100 mm). [1]

              3. Backlash and Wear Realities
              While pitch accuracy dictates the precision of the thread form while cutting in a single direction, overall operational accuracy is highly dependent on backlash: [1, 2]
              New Acme/Trapezoidal Setup: Typically exhibits 0.05 mm to 0.15 mm of backlash between the leadscrew and the half-nut.
              Worn/Used Setup: Easily degrades to 0.20 mm to 0.40 mm of backlash over time. [1]

              Working out exactly what effects such errors have on thread properties is a nice exercise for the reader.

              So lead accuracy is probably not a great worry on a lathe in good condition.

              Form errors due to imprecise grinding or tool setting up seem the most likely reason for noticeable error in a screw-cut thread.

              Clive

              #869335
              Howard Lewis
              Participant
                @howardlewis46836

                I have more faith in the form of a thread cut by a Tap or Die than one with a tool that I had ground.

                Will I have got the rounding right?

                Unlikely.

                The best that i could do, assuming that even with a cutter grinder, the tool was ground to the correct angles, would be to truncate the thread by turning the blank a tiny bit under size.

                Manufacturers of taps and dies are more likely to have ground the tool to the proper form than I could manage in a home workshop.

                Howard

                #869345
                Huub
                Participant
                  @huub

                  I often make threads on the lathe. Most of them are short (3 times the diameter of less). I use the CNC lathe (G33) for this because it is “accurate” and easy. By accurate I mean they fit my test nut or the counter part it is used for.

                  For a very tight fit (double nut to preload bearings) I use the CNC lathe where the spindle is driven by a stepper (C-axis). That assures the Z-axis and spindle (C-axis) are always in sync. Then the counter part is also used to get a tight fit.

                  I can’t make “high accurate threads” because I do not have the tools to check the thread made. The 3 wire method I use sometimes can only measure outer threads.

                  I do have non adjustable threading dies but these are used very rarely. When used, the nut always fits so “accurate” in my book.

                  On the CNC router I mill threads and check these with the counter part.

                  Don’t forget, I do this for a hobby.

                  #869365
                  DC31k
                  Participant
                    @dc31k
                    On Andrew Tinsley Said:

                    …nowhere can I find any quantitative data that shows how much poorer (less accurate?) are threads that are cut using dies.

                    Write down what data you want. There are numerous quantitative measurements possible on a screw thread. Look for some literature on ‘screw thread inspection’ for inspiration – the Internet Archive might be a good place to start.

                    If we take just simple measurement, pitch, what would we want to measure: any one pitch at random along the screw? A span of multiple pitches at different points along the screw? If we have an M6 x 1 screw, we know that 20 turns should move us 20mm. Measuring just that might leave us in a position where after 10 turns we have gone 8mm and we go 12mm in the next 10 turns.

                    Hence, you have to define “accuracy” before you start to measure it. For most people, ‘accurate’ means ‘fits the other part’. Whitworth wanted more than this: he wanted a nut from any random factory to fit a bolt from any other random factory. Does either method fail this test?

                    Consider that if you want to do a comparison, you might need to choose your measured quantities so they would highlight the strengths or weaknesses of the methods. As above, the form of a die would be better than that of a hand ground tool. Inserted tools are available pitch-specific, including correct root and tip geometry, so that the definition of ‘single point thread cutting’ would also need some tight specification.

                  Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
                  • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                  Latest Replies

                  Home › Forums › General Questions › Topics

                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                  View full reply list.