125 mm chuck onto my lathe

Advert

125 mm chuck onto my lathe

Home Forums General Questions 125 mm chuck onto my lathe

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #814239
    Steve Huckins
    Participant
      @stevehuckins53362

      My SC4 lathe has a 72mm register on the flange and this allows many 100 mm chucks with that size recess to fit.

      Whilst currently making a Kennions Tina stationary engine, I realised the limit of jaws of 100 mm chucks don’t allow for holding anything round which is much over 1.75 inches. So it was difficult to machine the cylinder end caps which were a bigger diameter than this to begin with. ( I did manage it eventually ) Reverse jaws did not close enough to hold the end caps proud for machining.

      But I was wondering if anyone has been able to fit a larger chuck onto a flange that only has this 72 mm recess as for instance, 125 mm chucks have a 95 mm recess. Is there an adaptor or alternative option to mount one ?

      Advice always welcome thanks

      Steve

      Advert
      #814246
      bernard towers
      Participant
        @bernardtowers37738

        Adaptor płatę?

        #814248
        JasonB
        Moderator
          @jasonb

          Piece of 125mm steel or iron bar. Face one side and machine to fit the 72mm spigot, drill and tap for studs.

          Mount to the spindle and face the otherside, turn larger spigot to suit a 125mm chuck, Mark position before removing to drill or tap chuck mounting hole sthen it can go back in the same position once the chuck is mounted.

           

          Should have been able to do it with reversed jaws, you may need a bit more tool stickout to get below the outer step. Or better still get some soft jaws for the existing chuck from the likes of Rotagrip

          #814260
          HOWARDT
          Participant
            @howardt

            I have an SC3, which I bought about 9 years ago and fitted a 125mm four jaw chuck to it.  Bought an adaptor plate to fit the spindle and machined it in situ to fit the chuck.  Obviously an independent four jaw requires less accuracy than a non independent chuck.

            #814280
            Graham Meek
            Participant
              @grahammeek88282

              Have you considered using Soft Jaws in you current chuck?  These are ideal for holding narrow components like cylinder covers.

              Regards

              Gray,

              #814283
              old mart
              Participant
                @oldmart

                A 100mm chuck should be capable of holding more than 1.75″ diameter, don’t you have the external jaws? If there is something fouling the jaw steps, then, as already mentioned some soft jaws would work. A 125mm chuck would probably require an adaptor plate, and by looking through ebay there are lots of barstock offcuts, some cast iron, but most mild steel that could be machined on your lathe to make the chuck adaptor for a larger chuck. You would need to first make a drawing of the spindle flange, and then attach the blank disc to the spindle, or a faceplate if you have one. Don’t worry about drilling/and or tapping holes in the plate to hold it on, there will be plenty of room to drill mounts in other parts of the plate later. We have chuck backplates with up to a dozen holes in them, plain and tapped and they work just fine. Also mentioned is a four jaw independent which is so much more versatile than a scroll chuck, just takes more time to set up to use.

                #814302
                Steve Huckins
                Participant
                  @stevehuckins53362

                  Thanks to all.

                  External jaws still didn’t work as the outer steps cannot close down to less than 2.5 inches as then they touch in the Center. The lower steps can hold the part but it means it doesn’t stick out for access to do the turning. I guess soft jaws are the first option and the second make a back plate as many have suggested.

                  Regards

                  Steve

                  #814305
                  Bazyle
                  Participant
                    @bazyle

                    This is why lathes used to be supplied with a faceplate (often rather than a chuck to keep apparent cost down) and the end caps should have been cast with a chucking spigot.

                  Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
                  • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                  Advert

                  Latest Replies

                  Home Forums General Questions Topics

                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                  View full reply list.

                  Advert

                  Newsletter Sign-up