Posted by Michael Gilligan on 03/06/2016 12:56:01:
Posted by OuBallie on 28/05/2016 14:47:54:
… be shocked that a company like MS would stoop this low.
I find it rather difficult to be shocked by the lowness of Microsoft's stooping
Remember; this is the company that killed both Netscape and Lotus.
MichaelG.
.Edit: … Oops … Forgot to mention OS/2
Edited By Michael Gilligan on 03/06/2016 13:09:18
MS's attempts at scuttling OS/2, which was a superb OS at the time and most definitely far superior to Windows, goes right back to the late 80s and Windows 2.x.
At the time I was working for a small software developer, we were keen to have our product ready to run on the then soon to be released OS/2 GUI, but the OS/2 Software development kit supplied by MS at the then astronomical price of $2500USD a seat was a major stumbling block. Not to worry our friendly MS salesman told us when we questioned the price, MS had a solution, we could get the Windows software development kit for only $70USD a seat, and they "guaranteed" that if we would use that for our development, that when OS/2 was released, our software would be completely compatible, needing nothing more than a recompile and some minor tweaks, at most a days work to have our software running on OS/2 as well as Windows.
Needless to say that is the last time I believed anything from an MS salesman. When O/S 2 was released it had basically two applications; Lotus 123 and WordPerfect. Around the same time MS released Microsoft Word for Windows and Excel accompanied by a whole slew of 3rd party applications by developers who had been tricked into developing for Windows. In one foul swoop, MS had put the first nail in OS/2's coffin and at the same time put Lotus and WordPerfect on the slippery slope towards extinction. Some people called it marketing genius, to me it was downright dishonest.
That being said though, as far as I am concerned Excel has the distinction of being MS's only product that could have succeeded on merit. All MS's other products were no better, and often especially in their earlier incarnations, far worse than competing products relying instead on clever and often extremely underhand marketing techniques to crush the competition and capture market share.
Clive
Edited By clivel on 13/06/2016 23:05:30