Further comments concerning secure mounting.
It’s important that the post clamps down on a region close to the outer edges rather close to the centre. Obviously this gives more “leverage” against rotation when compared to holding close to the centre.
The tool post / holder mounting area of the top slide on older machines is rarely flat. Even if apparently undamaged the continually repeated stress of bolting the post / holder down tends to make the cast iron flow and rise up around the fixing. Whether the top of the T-slot or around the tapped hole provided for a mounting stud in plain topped slide. Ideally you should attend to this by machining or filing flat. If hand work is the only way and your skills aren’t up to getting it super flat a ring washer of thin aluminium does decent job of spreading the load.
The official Dickson toolpost design has a recess of diameter approaching half the width of the post to, among other reasons, shift the clamping loads away from the centre. A good idea but it does mean that a small T-nut will tend to distort the slide in the middle and not provide proper retention. Many of the affordable posts, whether wedge or Dickson clone come with rather short T-nuts. Often the centre recess is omitted too. Ive seen smaller machines, of similar size to your Sable, where the toolpost was only clamping on a ring bout 1/8″ directly wide around the post. Careful inspection showed that the apparently firmly seated post was a thou or three clear of the slide for virtually all its width. The owner complained of serious chatter. Obviously the post was rocking in the clearance under varying cutting loads. Not easy to see on the machine.
Mr Dickson uses a stepped post holding stud with a stepped space at the top to confine location forces to top and bottom. This is a more predicable layout than trying to use a snug, constant diameter stud. The top and bottom registration scheme handles any perpendicularity error between stud and slide better and ensuring well spaced, positive location at both ends where a snug, content diameter stud may only contact in the middle.
These little niceties are important to successfully coping with that gremlin infested job that is determined to chatter on you.
For me one of the nicer things about the Dickson is that they are trivially easy to disassemble to clean out any swarf that may have gotten inside. Swarf in the innards really won’t help the action of any QC tool post. I feel it’s important to have a regular maintenance routine of keeping the innards clean whatever breed you use. The innards of my Dicksons have an infuriatingly “magnetic” attraction for the really fine stuff.
And one more thing concerning use.
Whatever the breed of QC post hold the tool carrier as close to exactly in position as you can mange before locking things up. Relying on the lock to pull the carrier into place tends to give inconsistent, lower than ideal, locking forces and may damage or distort things preventing perfect operation in future. The Dickson is notorious for bending the stud carrying the height setting thimble under significantly abusive use. Maybe an annoying feature but very easily fixed and obvious evidence of encounters with gorriliod machinists in the past. Which can be important evidence when assessing a used lathe.
Clive