Posted by JasonB on 05/07/2016 07:28:04:
The other thing is we don't know any details of Marks Crank, it could be for a wobbler or a 6" traction engine. While I would happily suggest loctite for one of those I would not for the other. The question was what to pin with so that is the question I answered.
As an example you can just see Rod's small blue wyvern next to my somewhat larger Galloway which the crank I have shown above is for. There is also the fact the Wyvern is throttle goverend so fires every cycle whereas the Galloway may onlt fire every 5-7 cycles with quite a kick that has to accelerate the two 10.5" flywheels back upto speed.
As they say there is more than one way to skin a cat but it helps to know the breed first.
.
Very fair observations, Jason … But forgive me if I question your logic:
In an earlier post, you wrote; "I … seldom use loctite for built up cranks as the IC engines have far more of a kick to them than steam." and here you confirm that "Galloway may onlt fire every 5-7 cycles with quite a kick that has to accelerate the two 10.5" flywheels back upto speed." … So your reasoning is fairly obvious.
Strangely, however, your conclusion is exactly the opposite to what mine would have been 
Using the same 'inputs', I would have concluded that a 'bond' which is fully distributed over the joint area would be more resistant to the kick, and would therefore have used either a fully silver soldered joint, or [more likely] Loctite 638.
I fully accept that what you have done works well for you … I simply offer that thought for discussion.
MichaelG.