Allan’s lathe is fitted with a specially wound 3-phase motor where 2-speed operation is achieved by switching the windings. It isn’t a bog-standard 3-phase motor, and it’s not simply a star-delta / 200,400V problem. The motor plate describes it as a delta/wye wye, not a delta/wye.
Reasonably good description of Mr Dahlander’s genius here. In early days of electricity it proved fairly easy to speed control DC motors, but DC power is hard to distribute efficiently. AC solves the distribution problem, but AC motors proved very difficult, and speed controlling them was initially thought to be impossible. Tesla’s breakthrough was extended by others, notably Heimholz and Dahlander. Unfortunately, speed control remained elusive because at the time there was no practical way of altering frequency. So, AC machines requiring speed control jump backwards through hoops to get it – gears, belts, and more complex forms of mechanical speed converter. Maybe a massive mercury arc rectifier so a DC motor can be used. Dahlander alleviated the problem with his 2-speed AC motor; they’re only found in high-end kit because of cost. The control wiring is somewhat complicated too:

Although 380Vac can be provided by an inexpensive Far Eastern VFD (example), that’s the least of the problems. Affordable VFDs have two significant limitations, both breached by a Dahlender 2-speed motor:
- As the inductance of the windings matters, VFD outputs are tuned to a single winding set. Connecting the output to a different set of windings is going off-piste, results undefined, and it might damage the motor and/or the VFD. RED ALERT: the Dahlander has a pair of 3-phase windings.
- Disconnecting a VFD output whilst delivering power is a no-no. The problem is that the windings can behave like a car-ignition coil, generating many thousands of volts. The spikes can easily destroy the electronics or wreck the motor by puncturing the insulation deep inside the windings. RED ALERT: the Dahlander changes speed by switching live phases, see contactors K1, K2 and K3 above. 3P also breaks the rule.
Options:
- Pay for a 3-phase supply. (Worth asking, don’t be surprised by a massive quote or outright refusal.)
- Buy a VFD that allows switching. (Expensive! Industrial supplier. Price on Application,)
- Install a rotary converter. (More affordable, starting at about £1500. Hard to find 400V.)
- Design an ordinary VFD solution that doesn’t break the rules. (Hard! Two VFDs maybe? Skilled work.)
- Change the motor.
I’d change the motor; Dahlender 2-speed was a good option before VFDs, now they’re an expensive embarrassment. I doubt anyone would specify one in a new design. Might sell for good money on ebay too, anyone who has to replace one is likely to be desperate!
Several motor choices:
- Single-phase. “Good enough” rather than good! Poor start torque, vibration, and forget speed control. Big single-phase motors are more trouble than small ones. I think a Weiler deserves better!
- DC motor. Good speed control and torque but the electronics above a kW become interesting. Good choice for small machine tools, less so for big ones. And the brushes wear out!
- 3-phase with VFD. Lots of problems go away. Smooth, easy speed control, many off-the-shelf solutions including packages with instructions and support. Plenty of advice on the forum and elsewhere. Mass-produced and affordable. VFD speed control of a single motor is simpler than a Dahlender.
- Brushless DC with controller. These are gradually pushing 3-phase motors aside. Similar to 3-phase with noticeably superior performance across the board, and they are more efficient. Becoming mainstream. Not checked the practicalities recently, but costs are dropping, instructions getting simpler, and packages are available. Many report good results by adapting Chinese industrial sewing machine motor/controller combinations, which are very affordable. Bit small for a Weiler – up to about 1.5kW, I believe.
Though 3-phase with VFD looks good in theory, I’d have a good hard look at the lathe’s drive train. Judging by the excellent lathes.co.uk, this is elaborate (remember jumping through hoops backwards!):
Buyers of both Matador and Condor were offered a choice of two drive systems, the Type W and Type VS. Intended for use by toolmakers, the Type W used a mechanically operated, infinitely variable-speed mechanism that, with a 7 : 1 drive ratio and fitted with a 2-speed, 1 – 2 h.p. motor, gave stepless spindle speed changes (on 50 Hz) from 28 to 350 r.p.m. in backgear and from 160 to 2000 r.p.m. in direct drive. The Type W is easily recognised by the large drum control wheel fitted to the front face of the strand immediately below the headstock. The Type VS, intended to be more efficient for general work and production processes, was equipped with an interesting oil-bath-lubricated, pre-selector gearbox that, when driven by the standard-fit single-speed 3 h.p. motor, gave spindle speeds from 30 to 620 r.p.m. in backgear and 170 to 3550 r.p.m in direct drive.
The Dahlander motor is part of a more complex system. If the motor is replaced, the need for a complex mechanical drive train diminishes. With luck electronic and mechanical speed control provide the best of both worlds – I believe the mechanical system is usually set to a compromise position and rarely moved. It isn’t how the lathe was designed to work. Or the other way round, the VFD simply switches between two fixed speeds. I doubt leaving the mechanical system in a fixed position would be a problem, but it’s uncharted territory for me.
I’d love to chat with a Myford TriLeva owner who has fitted a VFD. Does he still move the levers, or does the VFD make them redundant?
Dave