Mick B1,
Unfortunately, I have come across a number of software projects where the programmer has failed to consider the users, and what they may, or may not do.
I'm not a programmer, or software writer, or whatever they wish to call themselves, and I admit that the examples are all trivial, but it still leaves one wondering what else may be wrong. E.g.:-
A list of options, not in any sort of order, and certainly not alphabetic.
A list of options which did not include the necessary (ie it applied to me) of saying "None of the Above"
A programme which asked for my status, eg Employed/Unemployed/Retired. In my case Retired. Two questions down the programme then asked what my employer did.
A screen display using these silly "Almonds" in the corner of the screen, right where it could be mistaken for a screen aberration.
A programme which for no good reason that I can see changed the method of expanding or contracting windows from grabbing hold of the relevant side and moving it, to one whereby the user has to use the top left corner to expand/contract followed by moving the whole window if the required display is off to the right or the bottom.
A programme which in different places asks for an 8 digit number in a 2 x 4 configuration, but later asks for another 8 digit number, this time in a 1 x 8 configuration,ie lack of consistency.
The same programme which in one place places the cursor ready for data input, yet elsewhere does not. Now this could possibly be a security issue, but it would be better to be consistent.
I am therefore no longer surprised at anything a program may, or may not do; programs with a distinct lack of consistency; and above all, no thoughts about the poor user who has to navigate the morass of poor programming.
Peter G. Shaw
Edited By Peter G. Shaw on 26/09/2020 15:23:36