Posted by ega on 06/09/2019 14:20:37:
I couldn't see anything about speed control which seems a shame.
________________________
Didn't the original design deliberately give a fixed top speed within the maximum for the largest wheel and Prof. Chaddock gave some words of warning on this, including the type of motor to be fitted. Also, one function of the belt guards on the Mk. 2, which was intended for commercial use, was to discourage non-standard pulleys.
The new tooth rest looks as if it might be a useful improvement over the original rather awkward affair.
Can't see just how the "unholy" circular tee-slot has been dealt with though.
I think the appeal of the Quorn to the general modeller has reduced since its introduction in the '70's with the availability of fairly cheap cutters, which can be treated as "throw-aways" and TC inserts. There are also simpler T&C grinder designs available.
Also, the 4 flute end-mills on the market now mostly seem to have one cutting lip drawn over-centre, a feature that I've not found a way of deaing with on my Quorn without damaging the other lips.
Clive
Edited By Clive Brown 1 on 06/09/2019 15:38:07