Posted by JA on 29/07/2023 09:53:03:
What has Malthus got to do with bolt heads?
This topic has been taken for a good walk!
JA
I plead guilty to contributing to thread deviation, M'lud.
In mitigation, I claim to have suggested the best engineering reasons for mixing threads and heads on the same modern engine.
I don't believe it's done simply to screw-up home mechanics, because different heads are found far deeper inside the engine than maintenance normally goes. Things like the bolts holding water-pumps and the alternator together, those fixing the oil pick-up to the engine block inside the sump, fixings inside the cam-block, and those connecting cranks to the crankshaft, or that anti-harmonic thingy. Anyone on the forum ever completely dismantled an entire engine?
The engine in one of my early cars, a Talbot/Chrysler Sunbeam, or maybe a Horizon, contained a wild mixture of US, imperial and metric bolts. I think this resulted from the dreadful mess the British car industry was in at the time, where part of the answer was seen as collaboration between previously independent manufacturers in the same group. Chrysler owned what had been Rootes in the UK and Simca in Europe. Building on existing assets Chrysler UK produced a number of cars, as did others, from parts sourced from around the world. Not sure how long this went on, but many of the 'British' cars I drove during the seventies and eighties had both Imperial and Metric thread types, indicating mixed heritage. Due to being in terrible financial trouble makers couldn't afford to design new cars and engines from scratch, and had to make the best of what they already had. In the long run, not good enough, when foreign competitors have brand-new production facilities and haven't trashed their relationship with lenders, staff, and government!
Pretty sure this kind of financial pressure doesn't explain why universally metric modern engines mix hex, torx and other heads. As far as I know all modern engines are made with lots of different heads, reason unclear.
Dave