…
However, regarding the points and correct me if I am wrong but I think the only reason to use Tungsten is because it resists pitting from the spark. Is this important on a model that will only run occasionally?
Rod
Depends on how the reliable the model needs to be and for how long.
An ordinary spark reaches about 2000°C, well beyond the melting point of Steel, so sparks punch holes in it. Erosion is made worse by the vapour igniting, and hot steel is also chemically attacked by atmospheric Oxygen and by Nitrogen Oxides and Ozone created by the spark. Copper melts at a lower temperature (1084°C), and it doesn’t burn like Iron, so lasts a bit longer. Aluminium melts at 660°C and burns in air; it doesn’t survive long! These metals all work as contacts, just not for very long!
In addition to rapid contact wear requiring more maintenance, another problem is the contact gap determines the engine’s timing. Ideally the contact breaker should open and close consistently. Not so if the contacts are eroding. The engine’s timing will change if the contacts are closed for longer due to vaporised metal supporting an arc, and also as the gap changes size due to erosion.
That bad things are happening may not matter much. All is well provided erosion and arcing don’t stop the engine early or cause starting problems. As model engines run for minutes rather than hours, may not matter if sub-optimal contacts are used. Therefore an inferior substitute to Tungsten might be “good enough”.
Final thought, Spark Eroders are very good at cutting metal…
Dave