Wolfie.
Congratulations on the outcome of your experiments 
Mick.
For me, climb milling is almost always my first choice regardless of the depth of cut, as I tend to find cutters stay sharp for longer and I usually get both a better finish on the wall of the job, as well as finding it easier to turn the feedscrews due to what I consider to be a more natural cutting action i.e. not feeding against the rotation of the tool.
As soon as the infeed overlap starts to drop significantly below 50% of the cutter diameter there becomes an increasing tendency for the cutter to drive the work, so I find climb milling is most likely to grab the backlash in the slide with a combination of a large diameter cutter and a shallow infeed, at a large depth of cut.
A safer way to climb mill on a machine with appreciable backlash and small infeed, is to bias (push or pull) the slide to ensure the 'lash is removed before the tool engages in the cut, at which point the feedscrew is kind of used to regulate the pass rather than drive it.
Having said all that, using this method when machining the walls of a pocket should be done with care, particularly as the cutter engages in the corners, because this is where the backlash in the stationary slide can suddenly beome apparent
if it hasn't been accounted for by locking that axis or biasing out the 'lash
Martin.