There’s a lot to assimilate when first starting this Chris. And this isn’t going to reduce that.
As far as tool grinding, it’s really not that hard. All it takes is a bit of studying and understanding about what your trying to produce, some practice, then the rest is mostly technique for what your learning that does or doesn’t work as well. Cutting out a few sheet metal or even wooden gauges for your most used angles to lay on the grinders rest and position the tool that your grinding against are a big help to do it as cheaply as possible. Better or more sophisticated grinding rests can be bought or built later. But those are the basics, and once learned you have them for life. If the grinding wheel type used is correct, the ground clearance and rake angles on the tool are close enough to being correct, it’s properly honed as the last step, that’s it. Why would that be so hard to do? I taught myself how with a few books as reference for those recommended angles and some practice. And zero additional help from the internet since it wasn’t even invented yet. Anyone competent enough to produce even semi functional parts on any lathe is certainly capable of learning how to grind lathe tools.
But I don’t recall anyone mentioning this so far. Most or possibly all of the cheaper bench grinders come with about the poorest grinding wheel hardness, grit size and structure possible for any tool grinding. There used as a sales tactic, and how little the grinder manufacturers can pay to include them. And not because there the most suitable for the task. Yes if there not already glazed from prior use they will grind, poorly and slowly, and due to that produce a lot more heat. So if you don’t already have decent grinding wheels. Visiting a woodworking tool store and asking for there recommendations for the proper wheels they have available for grinding high speed steels would probably be a good idea. At least if the sales staff do know what really does work the best. Today there’s probably better than the aluminum oxide wheels I started with and still use.
Few Model Engineers would ever be as fanatical about HSS tool grinding and sharpening as many woodworkers are, so what there using is no different than what we need. Added to that, I’d highly recommend a diamond dresser. Even good grinding wheels need dressing once in awhile just to keep them doing what you bought them for. A properly dressed wheel is much easier and faster to produce a properly ground tool. Braised carbide tools can be rough ground using a green colored silicon carbide grinding wheel. However there lots of evidence that breathing any carbide dust that’s created can be extremely unhealthy for it’s long term side effects.
For now, practice getting the better surface finish. Once you can produce that, then it starts getting a bit more interesting and complex. Cutting that same surface finish, but then to the correct size you need is a bit tougher. And this is the important part most beginners take too long to appreciate or understand on there own because I sure did. Yes you have dials on your lathe and sometimes there even called micrometer dials. But for very logical reasons, those dials or even the very best DRO in the world mounted onto your lathe will not allow anything close to a micrometer level of cutting accuracy for your turned dimensions. They will get you close, but there still not accurate enough due to the lathe itself.
It’s not exactly intuitive in the beginning, but between a micron level and what is easily seen by eye, all machine tools large or small are still affected by simple physics. Your lathes components under cutting loads are all deflecting and being forced back and away from that load to the limits of any clearance, machine rigidity and lathe part cross section. Those are usually small enough they can’t usually be detected by eye, but there still present. The deeper the cut and or quicker the feed rate, the higher the loads are, and the larger those deflections and movements will be. The lighter the cut / feed rate, the less they will be. With the ability of accurate enough measurements, even the lathe chuck itself is distorting a bit as the jaws are tightened. Your or any lathes components are far less rigid than we normally think they are. And what you dial in for a depth of cut is NOT what your lathe will cut.
So for producing an accurately sized part to a target dimension. We have to come up with a method to work around or compensate for since those effects can’t be eliminated. Lets say you have a short bar of steel 1″ diameter and rigidly held in the lathe chuck. And it needs a reduced size dimension on the end of it measuring 1/2″, but the length of that turned step is outside this explanation. All were concentrating on is hitting that 1/2″ dimension. I’d rough turn it over size, and then accurately measure it. For round numbers, lets say it now measures .530″. So a further .030″ needs to be removed. Preferably your feed rate is already producing a decent surface finish, so we’ll leave that as it is. But we now have a much smaller but known amount to remove. On a smaller and lighter lathe, I’d then make two cutting passes taking .010″ for each cut. I’d then accurately measure the diameter again. Since both of those two cuts were using the same feed rate and cutting depth, the cutting forces for each have been duplicated as closely as possible for each one. I’d still expect each of those cuts to likely have some small amount of lathe and cutting tool deflection. So lets say on your lathe that dimension now measures .512″ That means each of those cuts was really only taking .009″ instead of the .010″ the cross slide was moved in for each cut. Depending on just how critical the size is or exact that .500″ needed to be? You still have a couple of choices. You could dial in a guesstimate of probably .013″ and fully expect to be very close to dimension, and almost certainly within + – .001″. If much more exact was required? You might further split the .013″ that’s needed to be removed in half. Take one cut of say .007″ and then remeasure. Let’s say it now measures .5063″ I’d then probably just dial in that .006″ plus a fraction of a thou if I could do it, and make my last cut. If it then measured a few .0001″ oversize and that was actually important enough? A bit of polishing with very fine emery paper and a few seconds would get it extremely close. Those lathe dials and even the feed screws are only so accurate, for the majority of work there close enough. But measuring the actual cross or carriage movements can also be done using dial indicators if desired. A secondary measurement method not dependent on the lathe parts themselves removes any errors that might be caused by feed screw or feed nut back lash. Or if the slides are poorly adjusted and too tight? That causes what’s known as stick / slip. The feed screw is being turned in, but the slides dovetail friction is high enough that slide isn’t actually capable of moving until that feed screw pressure gets high enough to force the slide to overcome it, and it then jerks ahead a less than predictable amount.
In fact I always use an indicator for longitudinal carriage movements. And for logical reasons, I don’t and never use any of my lathes top slides for parallel turning. Others will have different opinions about that though. In case it’s not obvious yet, internal boring has the exact same issues. Except it’s even harder for most of us to measure any holes with a high degree of accuracy. Most of Model Engineering doesn’t require extreme accuracy, but understanding what is or may not be possible is still worthwhile.
Every lathe and the larger they get is different. The more experience you gain with yours, the faster and easier it will be to get predictable results. All this might sound quite complex, it isn’t and takes just a fraction of the time to do than explain. It will soon become an easy enough method. But take your practicing in steps, get the surface finishes better, then start practicing and cutting to an actual dimension as the next step. Once you can start to do that reliably, your then well on your way for any real parts.
How to get started and machine with a lathe is one thing. None of us have even mentioned some of this yet, but its not too early to do so. Looking after your investment over the long term is just as important. I’d suggest that keeping any way surfaces as clean and well oiled as possible isn’t optional. Turning the outer skin off a cast iron casting or even hot rolled steel with mill scale on it is commonly mentioned, and the warnings about covering any exposed ways until that’s removed are 100% true. It seems to be less well known, and with the amount of scrap steel most of us pick up and hoard. Turning any metal with rust on it can be just as bad for your lathe. I brush or wire wheel as much off as I can outside first, then wipe on any oil at all that’s available on the metals exterior. A rag or even paper towels on the bed ways helps protect them until the shafts OD machining has removed any rust that’s left, and the oil keeps any air borne dust to a minimum. A bit more costly, but I think aluminum foil used for cooking works even better on the ways.
And that same way protection is absolutely required anytime your using any abrasives around a lathe or any other machine tool. Since the carriage is usually moving towards the head stock, you do have to be a bit observant and not let anything snatch that way covering and dump everything right back onto the ways you were trying to protect. Fwiw, my own shop is pretty tiny, for that reason I don’t even do any dry tool grinding inside it.
Any taper tooling used in either the head or tail stock Morse Tapers need to be absolutely undamaged. And both the male and female tapers need to be maintained and kept spotlessly clean before that tool shank is inserted. Any tool shanks Morse Taper you wouldn’t consider as clean enough to stir a pot of soup with isn’t something to be used in your lathe until it is. Damaged female Morse Tapers or left to rust are extremely expensive and difficult to properly repair. Not allowing that to happen costs very little other than a bit of time and attention to detail. I think it was George Thomas who used the phrase that “it’s just as easy to develop good habits as bad”.
Use a clean wooden board or piece of plywood under your lathe chucks and covering maybe 6″-8″ of your lathe bed every single time when removing or replacing any chuck. It’s not if your going to drop that chuck and do permanent damage to your way surfaces, only how long until you do that’s the only unknown. I had to learn that the hard way, so save yourself the trauma.
It’s inevitable that you WILL crash your lathe at some point. What that means is running the carriage or other lathe part into the rotating chuck, and usually done under power feed. Your lathe almost for sure has a shear pin on the lead screw that hopefully prevents any real and major damage. But there will be at least some cosmetic damage at the minimum, or up to broken parts. A magnetic base and dial indicator zeroed while first positioning the lathe carriage within where the maximum length of machined surface you need can almost eliminate that. If nothing touches in that position while your hand rotating the chuck a couple of times, your safe as long as you don’t ever go past that indicators zero point. Milling a good lathe bed mounted adjustable position carriage stop once you have enough practice to do so is one of the first things I’d make.
Crashing your lathe at any time should be a major learning experience about whatever you were doing you shouldn’t ever try repeating the same again. I have a very cheap drill press vise I partially drilled into its bed maybe 25 years ago, I don’t even use it anymore. But it still reminds me to think more and make less mistakes. And so far I haven’t repeated at least that one since. Once is a mistake that anyone can make, twice is a learning experience, more than that and were not learning what we should have from the previous two.