Posted by J Hancock on 22/11/2020 09:38:19:
A last point, for the accountants.
Energy from wind is free , yes ?
Or, if not free , then after all maintenance costs have been paid , free, yes ?
IF that is not the case , then how can any of the Green Policy be justified ?
You have to compare all the costs when alternatives are considered.
Open cast is cheaper than deep coal, which involves tunnels, winding, conveyor belts, and lots of people etc. Most UK coal was mined, the deepest shaft being 1400 metres in Lancashire. Geology makes open cast more practical abroad where thick seams are close to the surface. Even so extraction involves stripping £millions of tons of top surface to reach the coal underneath.
Once open to the air open cast coal is stripped with massive machinery before cleaning and sifting. Cheapest way to move it on land is by rail and then by sea. For example, coking coal dug at the Goonyella Riverside Mine in Queensland is transferred about 50km across Australia by narrow gauge railway to a purpose built coaling port at Hay Point. Hay Point is 6000 hectares in size and exports 32 million tons of coal a year. The coal likely goes to China, about 6500km away. In that case, the ore carrier does a round trip of 13000km per cargo, and the coal may be moved again by rail inside China.
So we have a strip mine with heavy machinery, a significant narrow gauge railway with engines and trucks, a large purpose built seaport, and bulk ore carriers moving heavy coal over long distances. All this requiring people, maintenance and replacement of worn-out equipment. And the whole lot is junk when the local coal basin is exhausted.
This compares with an unmanned wind farm transferring electricity by cable almost directly to the customer, most of the way using existing infrastructure. The wind may be unreliable in the short-term, but it never runs out. Yes the wind farm has to be built and maintained, but its substantially cheaper than coal. And cleaner. It's particularly economic in the UK because most of our coal is imported from Columbia, Russia and the USA.
The main problem with green energy is matching demand and production. Coal can be stacked in a yard and burnt when needed: it's easy. Wind and solar are cheap but they deliver at inconvenient times and electricity can't just be shovelled into a heap and used later. The problem is only partly fixed by building wildly scattered wind farms. Although unlikely to be a dead calm off Cornwall and Scapa Flow at the same time, it's possible. The issue isn't the cost of green power, it's making it available when needed. The problem is storage. Many options such as batteries, hydroelectric, steam, molten metals, electrolysis, ammonia, and compressed or liquid air etc. They all work, but none of them are the simple obvious answer, so the future is likely to be a mixture. Interesting times ahead.
Dave