He's a bit sensitive when it comes to criticism of his bikes, but if you do radical you cant expect everyone to like it, or your on a hiding to nothing, he joined the MC-chassis-design digest a while back in order to defend his ground breaking design, which is fair enough I suppose, it had recently been discussed briefly on the mailing list, however it backfired on him, not because his design is radical!, some of the guys on there have pretty radical stuff to, but a lot of them are racers or have worked as professionals in high end race teams and or major players in motorcycle manufacturing, one or two have published books on motorcycle chassis dynamics etc, most have built specials, be it funny front ends or other experimental type bikes, some have bikes that have been placed high on podiums in top flight bike racing inc TT, Superbike and or MotoGP II race series, all are very enthusiastic and willing to help others, but do not take prisoners, radical is good but not if it hinders performance or function just for the sake of it, he tried to argue his designs merits but fell short when faced with engineering realities which quickly became apparent he didn't fully understand, and when this was pointed out to him by very will qualified people he threw his teddy out the pram and left. 
My own view is he should have ignored this criticism and just got on with doing his stuff keeping his posting to more suitable custom bike forums, which are more form over function and left the others to get on with there stuff which is more function over form.
I'm unsure where I fit into this, so I read the comments and do my own stuff anyhow.
Only dead fish go with the flow……………………….
Below is a link to the above chassis design stuff
http://www.eurospares.com/
Edited By Involute Curve on 02/12/2017 19:28:16