I wrote the book in question and thought I would answer some of the questions appearing in this thread because some good questions have been raised:
"I would think the odds against a swarm of bees finding it are about a million to one."
Typically log hive and pallet hives fill within about 2 weeks during swarming season in the UK. The one in the book filled in 8 days from being put up. There are thousands of free living bees in the UK. Many live a long peaceful lives – I have detailed records of some continuously running for over 10 years.
"domesticated honey bees and wild bumble bees are in direct competition."
This might be true for commercially kept bees and even small aipiaries, but a wild colony in a tree consumes 10x less nectar than a typical box hive harvested for honey. Some of the reasons are:
1. No honey removed
2. Typically 5x thermal performance of a tree plus thermal inertia of tree mass.
3. Given the choice a bee chooses a cavity at least 50% smaller than a box hive, and once they have enough honey they turn their focus away from food security to hygenic behaviour.
Any insect consuming nectar (finite resource) will take it away from another when there is a shortage. Unfortunately the main reason for a shortage is humans not bees, and it is sad to see people pit one insect against another with regards to impact when the true cauase of the problem is elsewhere. Also remember that pollinators have very different habits and times of activities. The honey bee is very important for early pollination because they over winter in large numbers and are able to start 'work' early.
"Bees in the wild will get oll sorts of virus diseases, Israeli virus and other types. Varroa will cause wingless bees and they wander around aimlessly."
This is a bit of a myth. If it were true we would be finding hundreds of free living bees with disease – we don't. There have been many studies of this and the threat is to wild pollinators (honey and other) from box hives and not the otherway around. A few of the reasons found in the studies are:
1. The density of hives in an aipiary close togther (unnatural)
2. Horizontal transfer of disease from equipment and box use which does not occur in the wild
3. Many natural mechanism that affect health in the hive interrupted for honey production
4. A box hive does not follow the natural biology of the honey bee in many respects.
"If Alan's idea is so bad, does that mean beekeepers actively make efforts to keep down the population of wild bees?"
In 1930's a law was passed in Michigen requiring the destruction of all wild colonies due to 13% AFB disease in the box hives. Of the 300 tree colonies destroyed not one had any disease.
Honey bees have been free living in the UK since the ice age. I hope that we have not grown so intolerant of nature that we either destroy them or fear them. There is a lot to love about honey bees and all bees.
I understand that we use bees as a food resource and will continue to do so, but we should also allow bees to continue to live freely without interference, and give them support when we take away their habitats and resources. I kept bees as a child, but 50 years later I see them as more than a food resource. There are many good reason to do so … but this reply is long enough.
Sorry for the late reply on this and it being off topic, but I had to reply.
[moderator please delete if too off topic and issue close]