An Ounce of Practice is worth a Ton of Theory .

Advert

An Ounce of Practice is worth a Ton of Theory .

Home Forums General Questions An Ounce of Practice is worth a Ton of Theory .

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 58 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #111446
    Anonymous

      There is still quite a high technical content in the RSGB magazine (Radcom), including in recent years some very interesting work on software radios, albeit not in great mathematical detail.

      Software radio is an area where you really need to understand the theory in detail in order to have any hope whatsoever of putting it into practice.

      Regards,

      Andrew

      Thought I'd better add a PS:   RSGB = Radio Society of Great Britain

      Edited By Andrew Johnston on 09/02/2013 10:57:12

      Edited By Andrew Johnston on 09/02/2013 10:58:34

      Advert
      #111453
      Bazyle
      Participant
        @bazyle

        Theory:I used to ask electronics graduate interviewees how a superhet worked – few even knew let alone had built one. Practice: Few even knew which end of a soldering iron was hot.

        My gripe with modern consumer electronics is the impossibility of getting the circuit diagrams for repair and anyway there is normally some custom silicon you can't source anyway.

        We currently use 100MHz digitising front ends – not seen an IF transformer for years. Now I can get 1GHz front ends with two dozen digital demodulators, 32 by next year. Who needs that – nobody really but it's just digital processing so 32 is as easy as 2.

        #111455
        Anonymous
          Posted by Bazyle on 09/02/2013 12:37:34:

          Theory:I used to ask electronics graduate interviewees how a superhet worked – few even knew let alone had built one. Practice: Few even knew which end of a soldering iron was hot.

          I know, I know, that's the end where you go 'ow' and drop it after you've picked it up.

          Andrew

          PS: But I do know how a superhet works, and I have built one.

          #111460
          Sub Mandrel
          Participant
            @submandrel

            I rember reading Neville Duke's autobiography as a boy, I must borrow it off Dad again.

            Theroy vs. practice? I think the real meaning isyou can have all the book learning you want, but until you have done it wioth your own hands you can't be an expert.

            An obvious example is playing a musical instrument.

            From my own background of conservation land management, until you have actually seen what animals, weather and various other unforeseen factors do to your carefully laid plans over a few seasons, all the ecological theory you learnt makes you over-confident of your own abilities.

            Neil

            #111461
            Geoff Theasby
            Participant
              @geofftheasby

              I built a software defined radio from a kit, cost me £30. (A Softrock 40) The theory is easy, being only quadrature reception. Download a simple bit of software like Rocky and you are in business. Great fun! Now thinking of a Funcube Dongle Pro +

              Good to see other electronics types on here. NB, not all electronics graduates have studied radio frequency engineering.

              Regards

              Geoff

              #111464
              Russell Eberhardt
              Participant
                @russelleberhardt48058

                In my experience most people who say that theory doesn't work don't know the difference between theory and hypothesis.

                Russell, who studied electronics and communications in the analogue age.

                #111470
                Ady1
                Participant
                  @ady1

                  The Serbs jiggled about with their radio stuff to shoot that F-117A down during the Serbian bombing campaign

                  **LINK**

                  They switched from HF to LF or sumfink like that

                   

                  Anyway, bottom line is a few "amateurs" made a very high tech plane almost obsolete overnight

                  btw The missile they used was from the 1960s

                  Edited By Ady1 on 09/02/2013 14:42:57

                  #111475
                  Brian Wood
                  Participant
                    @brianwood45127

                    Some while ago I worked PT for a local firm of agricultural engineers. One of the team was a student from Leeds working towards a degree in engineering. He got his practical experience with our firm since the Health and Safety rules had closed workshops at the college.

                    Very early on in my time there he asked me to show him how to fit a hacksaw blade, to be more accurate, which way round it was fitted.

                    I later spent quite a lot of time showing him how to hand sharpen drills; I could understand that since it doesn't come easily, but to be close to qualifying as an engineer without the very first of basic practical understanding and knowledge worries me. He is proably directing jobs on site now.

                    Brian

                    Edited By Brian Wood on 09/02/2013 16:33:25

                    #111480
                    Brian Wood
                    Participant
                      @brianwood45127

                      Further back in this thread was mention of Titanic being let down [no pun intended] by inferior rivets, and blaming that on the accountants. That may not actually be true, but this story is.

                      In the later stages of Rolls Royce's readying of the RB211 big fan jet engine for service [late 1960's] a very expensive cock up was laid directly at the door of the bean counters.

                      The compressor drum on these engines is made up from many discs in titaniiun alloy,. electron beam welded together at the narrow rim sections a little below the fir tree roots holding the blading. The process is carried out in a vacuum chamber and superb welds are the result. To prevent beam impingement onto the weld on the far side of the drum a sacrificial backing plate catches any 'blow by'

                      Unknown to the team at RR, after successful trials, plain mild steel backing plates were substituted in an attempt to save money instead of ordering the expensive titanium alloy versions. The result was that production drums were welded up and contaminated on the inside with a brittle eutectic alloy of 40% iron and titanium which was undetectable by both elecrical and magnetic methods.

                      It was found by chance to rust easily and that was the only way of reliably sorting out the rogues. I believe the entire batch were scrapped since chances could not be taken. The cost ran into millions taking lost lead times into account as well as scrapped materials .

                      Brian

                      #111501
                      Sub Mandrel
                      Participant
                        @submandrel

                        Brian,

                        A more prosaic but perhaps equally irritating example is using carbon steel screws in oak site furniture instead of brass or stainless.

                        Neil

                        #111510
                        Anonymous
                          Posted by Geoff Theasby on 09/02/2013 13:44:50:

                          I built a software defined radio from a kit, cost me £30. (A Softrock 40) The theory is easy, being only quadrature reception.

                          Sorry I didn't explain myself very well; I meant a radio that does the A/D conversion directly from RF, so the whole signal chain is digital, except for a front end broadband amplifer/attenuator.

                          Regards,

                          Andrew

                          #111513
                          Andyf
                          Participant
                            @andyf
                            Posted by Andrew Johnston on 09/02/2013 10:55:52:

                            Thought I'd better add a PS: RSGB = Radio Society of Great Britain

                            I always thought it stood for the Ready, Steady, GO! Brigade

                            Andy

                            G1 B**

                            #111517
                            Springbok
                            Participant
                              @springbok

                              Dad used to say to me easy to cut off a bit but harder to put back on.
                              Think before you cut.

                              Bob

                              #111551
                              MICHAEL WILLIAMS
                              Participant
                                @michaelwilliams41215

                                The saying itself is meaningless .

                                Theory and practice are always portrayed as different things – almost mutually exclusive . Nothing could be further from the truth . Theory and practice just meld together to add to the body of knowledge on a subject .

                                Often theory will inspire practice and practice inspire theory – the steam engine is the best ever example of this happening .

                                Effective engineering needs an accumulated knowledge base of long established practice , well established theory – and minds open enough to use them , extend them and challenge them .

                                Regards ,

                                Michael Williams .

                                #111597
                                Russell Eberhardt
                                Participant
                                  @russelleberhardt48058

                                  Well put Michael.

                                  Russell

                                  #111612
                                  Halton Tank
                                  Participant
                                    @haltontank

                                    Having done the practice will definiteley affected the way you design things. Back in the 70s I was coming towards the end of long and rough night shift when I was called to fix an ATE (Automatic Test Equipment) that had gone down. I quickly found that a power supply had died, so I whipped out the Power Supply Tray out and fitted in a new one. Unfortuneately tray had two leads with identical connectors and of course I connected them the wrong way round. This caused so much damage that it took us two weeks to repaire the machine. This and other experiences stuck with me and when I designed equipment I would specify different connectors so its not possible to connect things wrongly.

                                    Regards

                                    Luigi

                                    #111640
                                    Takeaway
                                    Participant
                                      @takeaway

                                      I can think of one example where that old saying is definitely true.

                                      Back in another life I had to use a Swiss jig grinder to shape punches and dies to stamp out among other things, foils caps for yoghurt pots – you know, the sort that have a tab on for fingers to grip and pull of. It was all angles and merging radii and the drawing called for just .0001" (tenth of a thou) clearance between punch and die and poor old Charlie in the drawing office nearly had a nervous breakdown trying to get all the various co-ordinates in their correct positions.

                                      Somehow, he never really got it right. The solution I discovered, was to grind the punch profile first then fit it to the die using my advanced Mk1 lash up which consisted of a torch bulb connected to a PP3 battery. The bulb went underneath the die and the punch was lowered to the surface of the die. Using this method I was able to grind the rest of the die profile to a finish to within aforesaid tolerance. It took me a lot of practice but using this method allowed me to SEE the clearance rather than measure it. I have to admit that the contact earphones supplied with the HAUSER made it possible. It was a great success and 40 years later I like to imagine that some of my tools are still punching out the caps on your yogurt pots.

                                      Theory has its place and so does practice. I think we humans are very good at selecting either/or to get the best end result.

                                      ATB

                                      Stuart

                                      #111663
                                      Bill Pudney
                                      Participant
                                        @billpudney37759

                                        Michael Williams summed it up nicely.

                                        As a former Airframe Fitter/Design Draftsman/Production Engineer I feel that I'm qualified to sit firmly on the fence.

                                        Practitioners are fine within their area of expertise, but ask them to step outside that area and you could be in for big trouble. For instance I used to work with a brilliant machine tooling draftsman. He was asked to design and draw a product (not a piece of tooling) and it was a disaster. I ended up doing it for him. Then I found out that he was receiving 45% more salary than I was, not very pleasing.

                                        The theoreticians shortcomings have been well discussed here!!

                                        In an ideal world the practitioner and the theoretician would march off into the future in lock step.

                                        cheers

                                        Bill

                                        Maybe I'm not actually sitting on the fence!!

                                        #111784
                                        Jon
                                        Participant
                                          @jon
                                          Posted by MICHAEL WILLIAMS on 08/02/2013 09:07:10:

                                          An old saying and still often used .

                                          Is it True or False ?????

                                          Never heard it but get the gist and quite true on the saying.

                                          If i were to have a graduate in front of me with cv and a lout that had dropped out of school but had actually done some work, guess which one i would choose.

                                          Certain things a book cant teach you. In various industries over the decades the hiring of graduates and such like has always brought disaster, absolutely no idea what happens in the real world.

                                          A recognised qualification will only get you an entry in the door, it has no bearing on how good you are except the ability to study.

                                          Theres no substitute for on the job training, no books ever written can teach that.

                                          #111802
                                          MICHAEL WILLIAMS
                                          Participant
                                            @michaelwilliams41215

                                            Hi Jon ,

                                            I'm a bit sad to hear about my poor employment prospects at your place of work .

                                            Just out of curiosity what is it that you think I wouldn't be able to do ?

                                            Regards ,

                                            Michael Williams .

                                            #111814
                                            Tendor
                                            Participant
                                              @tendor

                                              There is a paper by Andrew H. van de Ven entitled:
                                              Nothing Is Quite so Practical as a Good Theory.

                                              True!

                                              #111835
                                              Anonymous

                                                The first company I worked for had similar machinations over employing graduates for the first time as Jon describes. There were endless meetings and discussions about whether new graduates were going to be up to the job and capable of making a useful contribution. In the end they did employ two new graduates, and it worked out very well.

                                                There are a couple of twists to the story. Both of the graduates they employed got starred firsts at Cambridge. And the main reason for the agonising was that up until then, all the technical employees, without exception, had a Ph.D and post-doc experience.

                                                Regards,

                                                Andrew

                                                #111917
                                                Sub Mandrel
                                                Participant
                                                  @submandrel

                                                  Some of the best new employees I've known have been career changers who have gone back to college. Real work experience + training + genuine hunger to work in the field.

                                                  Neil

                                                  #111974
                                                  Russell Eberhardt
                                                  Participant
                                                    @russelleberhardt48058
                                                    If i were to have a graduate in front of me with cv and a lout that had dropped out of school but had actually done some work, guess which one i would choose.

                                                    Surely depends on what you want him or her to do. I wouldn't employ a school dropout to design a racing car, a space probe or to invent a new piece of medical equipment. Of course, if you're talking about a graduate with a micky mouse degree in babysitting or something similar rather than a proper engineering degree it would be a different matter.

                                                    Russell.

                                                    #111981
                                                    Brian Warwick
                                                    Participant
                                                      @brianwarwick88192
                                                      Posted by Jon on 11/02/2013 21:31:35:

                                                      Posted by MICHAEL WILLIAMS on 08/02/2013 09:07:10:

                                                      An old saying and still often used .

                                                      Is it True or False ?????

                                                      Never heard it but get the gist and quite true on the saying.

                                                      If i were to have a graduate in front of me with cv and a lout that had dropped out of school but had actually done some work, guess which one i would choose.

                                                      More the fool you, if you are to condemn a person because they make an effort to better themselves and get a degree you appear to see this as a tag of incompetence. I have experienced graduates who lack common sense and lack practical ability but I have seen equal quantities of none graduates the same

                                                      I don't condemn either, I look at all their qualities after all the graduate has demonstrated they have an ability to learn where as in your simple scenario your so called lout could have come across closed minded employers like you suggest therefore they keeps getting jobs they are incapable of doing and that maybe why they are looking for work.

                                                      As for no substitute for on the job training this entirely depends upon who is doing the training what usually happens with on the job training is "this is how its supposed to be done BUT I do it this way" and then the trainee becomes the trainer and he show the next person his way. So while I agree on the job training is a valuable part of the learning it rubbish to suggest its the only way.

                                                    Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 58 total)
                                                    • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                                                    Advert

                                                    Latest Replies

                                                    Home Forums General Questions Topics

                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                                                    View full reply list.

                                                    Advert

                                                    Newsletter Sign-up