An electric motor actuated vice

Advert

An electric motor actuated vice

Home Forums Beginners questions An electric motor actuated vice

Viewing 6 posts - 26 through 31 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #389025
    Robin Graham
    Participant
      @robingraham42208

      Thanks for replies – as MichaelG rightly remembered it is indeed to do with a woodworking vice, I was just surprised that anyone would remember that I'd mentioned this possibility earlier!

      I'll re-read the discussion later with more attention to detail, but for now it looks like it it could be done with either a stepper and associated control electronics, a DC motor with current control, or a simple slipping clutch as in Hacksaw's link.

      I now have enough info to get back to my friend with some possibilities and see if he thinks it's worth pursuing – personally I can't yet see why one would construct such a thing outside a production environment, but it would be a fun project.

      Robin.

       

      Edited By Robin Graham on 02/01/2019 23:51:47

      Advert
      #389031
      Hopper
      Participant
        @hopper

        Alternatively, a pneumatically operated vice running off a common-a-garden workshop compressor might be simpler to make? A double acting cylinder, commonly available from commercial suppliers, could be either manually controlled by valves or electrically via a solenoid valve. Just don't leave your finger in the way when you hit the button/valve!

        #389032
        Tim Chambers
        Participant
          @timchambers76147

          You could incorporate a loadcell to control the clamping load.

          #389034
          duncan webster 1
          Participant
            @duncanwebster1

            Taking Tim's suggestion but making it a bit simpler, incorporate a preloaded axial spring in the drive mechanism, and detect when the preload is overcome to stop the motor. I'd be tempted to use a braked motor so it won't vibrate loose, but I suppose with this system the 'preload overcome' detector would just re-energise and tighten it up again

            #389038
            John McNamara
            Participant
              @johnmcnamara74883

              I am guessing that the force needed to clamp the work is more than the force that would cause injury to a person.

              When an individual builds a machine alone for personal use that person has to accept all responsibility for the safety of the mechanism.

              Apart from pointing out the possible risks. I would be hesitant offering advice to another person on how such a device may be constructed unless it was made safe by the installation of guards that stopped all access while the device is switched on or working.

              Safety systems have to be robust. Electronic means of protection have to have built in redundancy, they have to be duplicated, better still they should be backed up by a physical guard barrier.

              This paper is a useful guide.
              **LINK**

              Regards
              John

              Edited By John McNamara on 03/01/2019 02:01:45

              Edited By John McNamara on 03/01/2019 02:02:55

              #389044
              Hopper
              Participant
                @hopper
                Posted by John McNamara on 03/01/2019 01:57:37:…

                ….

                Safety systems have to be robust…..

                As we used to say in the car factory, it's no good making safety guards foolproof; they need to be idiotproof.

              Viewing 6 posts - 26 through 31 (of 31 total)
              • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

              Advert

              Latest Replies

              Home Forums Beginners questions Topics

              Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
              Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

              View full reply list.

              Advert

              Newsletter Sign-up