Judging by the photo, Jason is reviewing a typical Far Eastern hobby lathe that’s been upgraded with a brushless motor and an electronic lead-screw. Waste of time reprising the pros and cons of hobby versus industrial lathes: it’s a hobby lathe! Likewise, brushless motors are currently the best option available, so Jason need not spend a lot of time explaining why.
The main benefit of the AMABL210E is it’s built-in Electronic Leadscrew. ELS are a popular hobby modification, and they are common as muck on CNC lathes. ELS isn’t new technology, it’s an established technology being applied to hobby equipment because costs have dropped enough to make that possible. Stepper motors and microcontrollers have been mainstream for 40 years. I don’t think Jason should waste time explaining that.
ELS advantages are obvious: no messing with change-gears, and, unlike a mechanical gearbox they aren’t constrained to common ratios. Setting them up ought to be considerably simpler and faster than a geared system, and potentially less error prone, though that depends on how the user interface is programmed. Simple buttons, or a deeply nested menu system?
Whether or not an ELS is of value depends on how often it’s used! Taking myself as an example before illness stopped play, I don’t lathe cut threads all that often, and they are almost all metric. The time taken setting up change gears to cut a thread on my manual lathe is considerable, but doesn’t matter to me much, because I don’t cut lots of threads, and rarely work against the clock. Your workshop might be completely different, needing to cut many different threads in a hurry. Or the operator might wish to avoid the faff of understanding those change gear tables! When evaluating equipment it’s important for purchasers to be clear about their requirements, typically dividing them into Musts and Shoulds. Don’t buy if a must isn’t satisfied, and don’t waste money on costly features that might be useful! No need for me to rush to fit an ELS, but the convenience is tempting if I was buying a new lathe.
A professional review follows a template and is scored against requirements,. Jason can’t be expected to address our individual requirements or prejudices because he doesn’t know what they are! However, might be useful to follow the usual template headings:
- Features – what the ELS provides, presumably most common Imperial and Metric threads, possibly BA, maybe arbitrary pitches. Up to shoulder etc. How much is automatic, and how much needs a lively operator!
- Trustworthy – during a session, does the lathe thread consistently and without mishaviours such as crashing into the headstock?
- Reliability – longer term, will the ELS last? Impossible to establish in a short trial, but Jason might comment on how hot the electronics get, and how exposed they are to swarf, liquids and clumsy operators! Might find out about Spares availability.
- Usability – intuitively easy to drive, or complicated, requiring much swotting and a manual!
- Interoperability – can it be connected to an external computer.
- Cost of Ownership (time and/or money)
- of adopting the technology – buying the machine and learning how to use it
- job set up time
- licences
- maintenance
The cost of ELS and CNC were discussed at a SMEE meeting recently, it being noted that:
- CNC is a significant investment requiring CAD and milling skills and costly machinery. 3D-printing in plastic is far less onerous than 3D-cutting metal. Adopting CNC is a major investment, high risk.
- ELS is much cheaper and straightforward – a more convenient way of doing an existing turning operation, not a major investment. Low risk. I’d expect Jason to confirm this is true, and it will be very interesting if he finds otherwise.
I don’t think Jason should entangle himself in the old versus new debate. New buyers are more likely to buy ELS than established workshops. Therefore no need for Jason to convert traditionalists by explaining why:
- electronics are more reliable than mechanical solutions.
- it’s easier to replace electronics than it is to fix clapped out machine tools.
- it’s not necessarily sensible to own tools that last 60+ years. Longevity is only one feature, and is often desirable rather than mandatory…
Dave