Posted by Ian P on 13/05/2019 16:13:25:
Posted by Neil Wyatt on 13/05/2019 15:54:08:
Posted by Ian P on 13/05/2019 14:58:47:
I have never quite understood the logic of the various methods of preventing a bolt or stud touching the bottom of the slot. Allegedly it to prevent the slot ears being broken off, as I see it the same damage would be the same whether the nut was being pushed from below or pulled upwards from above.
Two reasons:
The main risk if the thread bottoms out without the object clamping and you don't realise you might keep tightening trying to sget some grip and jack the nut up to break the slot.
For heavy clamping ideally the object being clamped pushes down to the t-slot so it is squeezed rather than just pulled up. When applying upwards-only force you need to be careful of over-tightening especially if shock loads can be expected.
If someone tightens a bolt/nut/stud with enough force to break off the slot lugs then I would say they were not using a force commensurate with the job in hand. One has to have some mechanical understanding and sympathy (or use a torque wrench all the time).
Squeezing the slot projections does give by far the strongest fastening but it is not always an option. The machine vice I use has grooves down each side so can only be held down with clamp plates.
Ian P
Hi Ian P, it is the realisation that the bolt/stud is bottoming out that is the important point. You can get a situation where you are tightening the top nut on a stud and the stud turns in the T nut rather than the top nut turning on the stud. You may find that the clamping is still loose, so you give it a bit more and you may not feel the resistance that is capable to break cast iron slots. If this situation where the clamping is not being achieved, the stud will not yet be in full tension, but the bottom of the stud will be in compression, which can be greater than you realise.
Caution is better than a blunder.
Regards Nick.
Edited By Nicholas Farr on 17/05/2019 08:46:57