The extra complexity of the Tri-Leva is a negative, though that wouldn’t put me off if it’s in good condition and cheap! The belt changer and two-speed motor aren’t mainstream. Read what lathes.co.uk says. Note the cracked mounting plate problem.
Tri-Leva’s exist because there’s a problem with single-phase motors, notably they don’t like stop-start operation, and can’t change speed. (And more…)
One way of avoiding stop-start operation is a clutch, and I think the Tri-Leva provides that. Speed control is usually provided in fixed ratios by manually swapping a belt between pulleys, which is a bit of a pain. As belt changing is a time-waster if it has to be done a lot, the Tri-Leva makes belt changing easy to do, but it’s more to go wrong!
Myford used single-phase motors because in 1947 they were the only easy way of powering a lathe from an ordinary domestic power supply. Today electronics provide better alternatives: lathes can have speed controlled DC, 3-phase, or brushless DC motors, all of which are more suitable than a single-phase motor. Thus the need for belt-changing is much diminished, and I doubt anyone would make a Tri-Leva style belt-changer today.
Belts are still useful because they multiply torque and are quieter than gears. Quite common for Far Eastern hobby lathes to come with electronic speed control and a two speed belt providing high and low speed ranges. My lathe goes from below 30rpm up to nearly 3000rpm, with one belt change in the middle. It’s a different compromise: changing the belt is a nuisance, but in practice I rarely need to. Apart from screw-cutting, I mostly run on the high speed belt-setting, between 250 and 3000rpm.
In short, the TriLeva is for workshops that have to make frequent speed changes, but a better answer in 2025 is to fit an ordinary lathe with a VFD and 3-phase motor. A complicated mechanical unit and a 2-speed single-phase motor aren’ smart today – it’s not 1956! So I wouldn’t pay over the odds for a Tri-Leva. The march of time has taken the Tri-Leva from being a definite positive to a mild negative. Not a deal breaker though.
What do you expect to do though? If the work doesn’t require a lot of speed changing, then the Tri-Leva is just more to go wrong. And if the work calls for a lot of speed changing, then there are better alternatives. However, I suspect most workshops are in the middle, where a lightly loaded Tri-Leva wouldn’t cause trouble by breaking down, and would provide perfectly good service across 3 speeds.
In my opinion, the condition of a secondhand lathe matters far more than the brand or Model. Forget it was made by Myford and is a Tri-Leva. They don’t matter if the bed is worn, or the bearings are shot, or the motor smokes, or the electrics are unsafe! The best way to identify problems is to have the lathe cut metal. Check the controls work smoothly across the full range, it cuts straight, and there are no electrical tingles, overheating or nasty noises. A beginner problem is spotting the difference between a dirty well-maintained lathe and one that’s been tarted up with paint and abrasives. The premium prices paid for Myfords in the past attracted bad behaviour, though this seems less likely today, perhaps because demand is dropping. Or maybe the internet is making buyers more savvy. Dunno.
Dave