Posted by pgk pgk on 13/05/2019 09:16:58:
The trouble is that the true cost of motoring isn't just fuel and oil.
…
Perhaps of more interest is whether Martin P actually manaed a higher average speed at 70mph cruise than at 60 mph cruise – possibly since the motorways should be quieter Oop North. When I was regulalrly driving from here to bedford in my GT86 – 160 miles – then the best time i ever managed was 2.5 hrs once only, an average of 3.5 hrs and a worst case of nearly 6hrs
…
Us older chaps tend to assume that waste disposal is free, actually it's not. Treating COPD and asthma costs money. More worrying is motoring's contribution to climate change. Happy is the man who fixes global warming by denying it, or imagining it will only make warmer winters! Time will tell, but the cost of global warming could be off the scale. Full cost of motoring should include the cost of damage done by what comes out the exhaust.
Though interesting, chaps reporting good MPG on long distance trips don't alter the price of fish much. It's the average fuel efficiency of all motorists over all journeys that matters, not individual experience. At the other end of the efficiency scale my best 18 mile commute to work took 28 minutes (avg 38.6mph). But in seven years, I only got a clear run twice. 40 minutes was a good day (27mph) and the mode was 58 minutes (18.6mph) Worst ever was 2 hours 20 minutes (7.7mph). This is what happens when journeys force you and all the other worker bees along busy roads through town centres. Sad creature I am, I counted 27 traffic light controlled junctions and pedestrian crossings between home and work, and on a bad day all of them would stop me. On top of that, almost anything else would cause delays. I've been blocked by roadworks, rain, accidents, breakdowns, bad parking, inconsiderate drivers, lorries shedding their loads, bike races, marathon runners, xmas lights, and royalty. Don't get me started on the effect of delays on my chance of finding a space to park! I suggest nasty commute driving is far more common than enjoyment of the open road. Being retired, I've almost forgotten how awful most driving is.
I suggest electric cars shine at the difficult low-speed stop-start commute motoring most people have to put up with. Electric cars don't waste energy or pollute whilst queuing. Most people aren't whistling down an autobahn taking a caravan around the Grand Tour. Very large numbers of people are obliged to make lots of short range journeys and keeping them productive is important.
It's a mistake to try and overlay how we do things today on the future. It will be different, better in some ways, worse in others. Quite likely future motorists will run a relatively short range car that they recharge slowly overnight or at work. They won't expect it to do everything, and perhaps hire something else for occasional long range journeys or heavy lifting. The 'something else' could be a hybrid, or a car that can recharge from overhead wires, or one fitted with exchangeable batteries, or fast-recharge, or a fuel-cell.
It occurred to me whilst queuing to refuel that an electric car would eliminate my need to do that ever again. Rather than physically moving my car to a pump with a debit card, my travel pattern would let me recharge comfortably at home. Think how much extra time I would have to blather and pontificate on the forum…
Dave