Posted by Steviegtr on 05/01/2020 15:26:19:
Can anyone verify my theory about the cutting medium melting into the work, where oil does not.
Doesn't sound likely to me : very few liquids 'melt into' metals, and if they do they're nasty!
Cutting fluids have three or four jobs to do, and what works best depends on the circumstances. With cast-iron, the main purpose is removing dirt: no help is needed in the way of lubrication. Lubrication isn't needed much with brass either, and it's not dirty. Steel is harder to machine and gets smoking hot: lubrication, swarf removal and cooling become important. Aluminium cuts best with a thin oil which lubricates whilst preventing welding. More difficult materials like Stainless and Titanium demand lubricants that will take extreme pressures and high temperatures – an oil performing well on mild-steel might not cut the mustard. The fourth job of a cutting fluid is a long list of don'ts: don't mark the work, don't damage the machine, don't poison the operator, don't make a mess; don't cost a fortune, don't pollute the planet etc. Quite a few traditional cutting agents work well apart from failing one or more of the "don't" tests. For example, an old-fashioned emulsion unacceptable in a modern factory because of mess and health issues, would probably be fine splashed around in small quantities at home.
Threading with taps and dies and manual sawing is something of special case. Hand-driven multi-point tools need all the help they can get, swarf is tiny, and slow cutting puts extraordinary pressure on the lubrication. On the other hand heat and cleanliness aren't problems. For manual purposes I find CT90 works better than the cutting oil I use on my lathe and mill, which is otherwise good stuff.
One of the reasons I like carbide tools is the reduced need to worry about cutting fluids; very often it's possible to cut dry.
Dave