Posted by Dinosaur Engineer on 07/12/2010 16:00:42:
Maybe the toothed belt is used due to a small pulley being used ( high torque at small radius) and the pulley wheel centres are close so that it’s difficult to provide enough “wrap around” for a ‘V’ belt. A friction belt would be better than a “geared” belt as it’s more likely to slip rather than cause mechanical damage. The equivalent ‘ v ‘ belt drive would probably need more space and/or a tensioning roller to increase the small pulley “wrap around”
I agree with all of that and would say that if a small ‘toothed belt’ drive pulley is used, then that is probably a bad thing in this instance, as the belt will be prone to shedding its teeth.
Poly-V belts are much better under these circumstances, due to their slim construction and will wrap around smaller pulleys than other V-belts, but do need to be properly tensioned.
If the lathe in question has inadequate tensioning arrangements then that might be why the maker went with a toothed belt design, as it is more forgiving if left loose.
Almost all other manufacturers use V-belts of one style or another.
Martin.