This one is going to run and run.
Taxonomy is very dependent (maybe that should be totally dependent) on the parameters you use to form similarities and distinctions when grouping stuff in any kind of structured relationship. In order to bring some order to the vast diversity of life early classifiers notably Carl Linnaeus quite reasonably chose easily identifiable characteristics to assemble his groupings with more specific characteristics used to subdifine larger related groups with common attributes. Largely this methodology has stood the test of time although modern genetics has led to a good deal of shuffling around in terms of close relations.
Along side all this has always been common names which by their nature are specific to the 'thing' and sometimes very 'local' in their usage.
Spade is a common name and you need to know what it refers to to make any sense of it, personally operated earthmoving artifact is more descriptive and will universally convey more information but no one would see it as being particularly convenient to use.
In similar ways engineering terms can be common usage or more technically precise. As a classification all forms of 'welding' should really be fusion bonding and all forms of 'soldering' should be thermally induced capilliary bonding by sub melting point filler material (or some such) and then further subclassified in terms of the filler material. So to fully classify this particular subset of jointing we would need a binomial classification.
Practically speaking no-one is going to bother with all this and everyone will carry on with the common name for what they are doing. You can always ask for a description if you don't know what they are talking about.
regards Martin
Edited By Martin Kyte on 22/01/2020 09:33:28
Edited By Martin Kyte on 22/01/2020 09:34:44
Edited By Martin Kyte on 22/01/2020 09:35:00