In the link which Mark posted, 'rocketpatel' and 'Phaeonyx' talk about kick back at low speed, in their low cost rc brushless conversion. Could someone explain what they mean? There is also a comment about back emf earlier in the link topic, which I do understand, and I would have thought that it is a concern, to a certain level, in so far as 'how does this effect household wiring' and in turn how this might effect household building and contents insurance?…I am not scare mongering. It is just an observation which I question. As far as household insurance is concerned, hopefully the machine is in a garden shed, so it does not matter as insurance might not pay out anyway? 
Neils link is also interesting, and in particular this point: 'They also require control strategies that can be both complex and expensive. And, they require a controller that can cost almost as much as if not more than the BLDC motor it governs.'
In my opinion, the guy who has changed his lathe using rc stuff might know a lot about rc stuff, and his idea may/might work for hobby conversion, with its issues on torque and kick back? and back EMF, to name a few. I am not knocking that in any way. It does the job for him at perceived low cost, and it is a great boost for his pocket and ego…bravo…rip-off Britain and all that. However, I definitely question his engineering competence in so far as did he have the right machine for his purpose in the first place? and did he know if he was using or abusing his machine?. Yes…I have seen his amazement at the cost of the original components…which are not even for his machine!…and no…this is not the reason for my question…nor is it a sour grapes issue.
However, it is important to note that when a manufacturer of a machine such as SIEG instals brushless motors and controlling systems into their machines, the issues are far more complex, as Neils link suggests. In such installations, the control strategies deal with and provide appropriate and consistent torque throughout the speed range, based on specific requirements and purpose of each machine model in their range. They also have costs of additional components which are required to comply with and go through CE regulatory requirements. These components and costs are not included in U.S. or Canadian machines, which please note.
This is not a PR statement. It is just a clarification which I am bringing to attention in this thread to avoid simplistic comparisons.
In my opinion, it would be more 'correct for the purpose' of conversion to consider a three-phase motor with inverter from one of the reputable advertisers shown on the right here, with CE, and filter, to deal with back EMF, further verified by a qualified electrician as need/required/appropriate. This might be more expensive than rc brushless, but cheaper than 'proper' brushless conversion.
Ketan at ARC.
edited to deal with a buck load of spelling mistakes..sorry
Edited By Ketan Swali on 13/12/2015 16:49:26