I believe it's reasonable to assume that motion sickness is a result of confusing sensory input that causes the body to react as if it has ingested a toxin that causes nausea. I phrase that carefully because not all noxious substances will cause vomiting. Those that do will primarily be associated with dizzyness and balance disturbance which is based in sensory input conflicts from vision, the semicircular canals and positonal awareness (based deep in the spinal chord). But all those sensory inputs have to travel to brain centres so direct toxic effects on those or damage elewhere that releases active substances can all be responsible.
However one of the aspects of our humanity is memory and belief and past experiences will colour our judgement as well as the simple element of placebo response. Thus if static did cause (for instance) a degree of hair-raising and that happened in conjucntion with a past episode of nausea it may be a signal towards panic and another bout and just as simply believing that a grounding strap works may be effective. Any experimentation to prove or debunk such hypotheses requires proper double blind trials.
One reason for all the internet myths and 'old wives tales' will often be that if some benefit occured through coincidence or in a statistically low percentage the beneficiary is more likely to hail the miracle louder than the many who gained no benefit. At the same time one cannot gainsay the simple expedience of 'if it works for you then use it.'