A question has been raised regarding pilot licencing in the aftermath of Brexit. The short answer is that along with everybody else I have no idea what is going to happen.
I suspect that there are two questions; one to do with power flying, and one to do with gliding.
In the UK power flying is adminstered by the Civil Aviation Authority, ie, the government. The situation is slightly messy in that to fly a light aeroplane there are three licenses, PPL(A), LAPL(A) and NPPL. Each has different privileges and medical requirements. Roughly speaking the PPL is recognised world-wide, the LAPL is Europe only and the NPPL is UK only and limited to non-EASA aircraft, and some vintage aircraft. The boundaries are blurred, but they have been for decades. My gut feeling is that not much is going to change; even for the most anally retentive politician these matters are below the horizon. Also, the rationalisation of licencing is world-wide, not just European.
My EU medical is as near as darn it the same as the CAA one, except I need an ECG every two years instead of every year. The EU PPL is similar to my CAA one, except that I now have a 'Sailplane Towing Rating' which didn't exist before. The upshot of that is that you now need training to be a tug pilot. Unlike my case where I was told there's the tug, there's the glider, get in and get on with it, no dual tows, nothing!
For gliding the situation is very different. Unlike the rest of Europe in the UK gliding is administered by the British Gliding Association, so no state issued licenses and no state control. Airworthiness is separate; most modern gliders fall under EASA, and I suspect this will remain so. In principle the EASA regime is a good one, as it has tightened up on things like documentation and ADs. The main problem is one of degree; we need an EASA-lite regime suited to gliders and not a cover-all from private gliders to commercial 747s.
We were on track to have EASA sailplane licences by April 2016. As always the situation is messy, as there were several licences available, including a LAPL(S) and SPL(S). For the UK this was onerous, as we needed to obtain aerobatics ratings and cloud flying ratings, neither of which were needed before. In theory this goes against the EU rules as they are not supposed to do anything that removes rights people already have. Of course it is complicated as I think (?) the UK is only country in the world where we are allowed to fly sailplanes in cloud, let alone with no qualifications!
It was clear that the issue of EASA sailplane ratings was a mess, and the introduction across Europe was postponed until at least 2017. What happens then is anybody's guess. I was reading the European Gliding Union newsletter yesterday, and it is clear that across Europe the introduction of EASA licences in 2017 is way too soon. There are many unaswered questions and things that have not been thought through. My guess is that it will be deferred again.
The introduction of the new ratings caused many anomalies. For instance an instructor without a basic aerobatics rating could demonstrate a spin to a pupil in a two seater, and supervise the pupils' attempts at entry and recovery. But they couldn't legally spin their own single seater; go figure!
That's enough of that, time to do something useful in the greenhouse and garden.
Andrew