I have disk springs between the head and the locking handle to maintain some friction on the spindle at all times. This allows it to be locked and unlocked enough to move it but keeps pressure on the spindle to resist its tendency to rock when the lock is released. I have 8 disks in four dished face to dished face pairs.
Also maybe reduce the spring return strength, it’s set high for drilling so that the spindle pulls up when released. Since milling forces with positive rake cutters try to pull the cutter into the workpiece it is better to always have the spindle rack down on the pinion rather than held up to it up by the spring and friction working against gravity and the downward pull.
Martin C
<p style=”text-align: left;”>The above is the best solution to the problem of locking absent replacing the locking system with something better.</p>
<p style=”text-align: left;”>The locking system uses a clamping mechanism with a split cylinder having a concave relief cut halfway down the cylinder. The cylinder is split at the centre of this relief and when the locking handle is turned the two halves of the cylinder are drawn towards each other and clamp on to the quill (one day, I’m going to draw this out in CAD for use in discussions such as this; for some reason I find explaining this mechanism particularly hard).</p>
One of the problems with this mechanism is that, unless the quill is a very close running fit in the head casting (and even in the Taiwanese models, let alone the Chinese ones, it very rarely is), it leads to the quill moving in the radial axis.
The RF-45 and clones have the same locking mechanism and Stefan Gotteswinter had one and did an excellent video about fixing this problem. It is rather a drastic fix, mind you, and one that most of us with round column mills or even RF-45s are likely to find somewhat intimidating.