A year ago, I spent some time researching bronze composition when I found there was little written about the subject. At the risk of criticism for errors I offer the table below. I gathered the information by searching the web for many worldwide manufacturers/suppliers, and came up with this. Please note that some suppliers may vary the composition by several percentage points, and there is potential for the use of added nickel in some bronzes.
| BRONZE % |
Cu |
Sn |
Pb |
Zn |
P |
|
| Admiralty |
88 |
10 |
|
2 |
|
|
| Gun Metal LG2 |
85 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Plus 1-2% Ni? |
| PB1 |
87.8 |
11 |
0.2 |
|
1 |
|
| PB102 |
94.8 |
5 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
| Colphos 90 |
87.8 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
0.2 |
|
| SAE 660 |
83 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
|
trace P and 1% Ni? |
The true phosphor bronzes are PB1 and PB102; although Colphos 90 contains phosphorous the addition of lead and zinc makes it quite different from PB102. People call bearing bronzes phosphor bronze, which I think is wrong.
For beginners in bronze I would stress the use of PB102 for anything attached to a steam boiler. There is a thought that the zinc in other bronzes could be leached out (as with brass) leading to a weakness, but I have not read of any proof of this. It was this issue that caused me to look at the compositions when I realised that some of our suppliers were not fully clued up on the subject.
Having said the above about suitability with steam, I presume that bronze castings are a simple gun metal and its use in cylinder castings works without problems. Colphos 90 and SAE 660 are regarded as bearing bronzes and you can see that their composition is similar. I understand that the aluminium bronzes are potentially hard, have come about from aerospace technology and are probably best avoided by us.
LG2, PB102, SAE660 and Colphos 90 are commonly available. PB102 machines ok and silver solders nicely, but it can be fussy about drilling and is difficult to ream. Colphos 90 and SAE 660 will also silver solder well and are that bit easier (softer) when machining.
Norm.