Americans traditionally tended to prefer induction (asynchronous) machines in their electric and hybrid vehicles, as they are simpler and don't require the expensive (and foreign) neodymium magnet material. They are also more rugged and larger, which often isn't such a problem with their vehicles. Europeans and Far Eastern manufacturers are happy with permanent magnet (synchronous) machines which are smaller and thus easier to package – but more challenging to design and drive – you need a rotor position sensor for a synchronous machine, whereas you only(!) need a speed sensor for an asynchronous machine. The drives are fundamentally similar to the VFDs we know and love and 4-quadrant regenerative operation comes as standard with modern digital control – it's hardly a technological breakthrough.
Modern vehicles have pretty sophisticated braking and stability systems (by law), so it's not surprising that there's a legally binding regulation (UN ECE 13h) that governs regenerative braking. The idea is to prevent the vehicle losing control due to inappropriate application of large amounts of braking torque. It's pretty complicated when you consider that the amount of braking available will be dependent on the state of charge of the battery and how much power it can accept, so the motor drive must interact with the engine, transmission and vehicle controllers. You'll be glad to know there is also a safety regulation (ISO-26262) that aims to ensure that these systems are designed and validated to meet an appropriate level of robustness and reliability.
Switching the power devices at frequencies above 10kHz helps to reduce the audible noise from the motor but requires more processing power and increases the switching losses in the IGBTs. The Toyota / Lexus vehicles make an audible noise although it's not off putting. I believe they used to operate at 5 and 10kHz.
AFAIK, the university e-racers typically use brushed motors (eg fork lift hydraulic pump motors) which allows for simplicity and pretty much prevents any regen, at least from what little I know of the US scene currently. The drive is essentially a beefy buck converter.
3-phase motors generate a pretty constant torque, unlike single phase machines, which is why they are smaller for the same power rating. The starting torque for a single phase motor is entirely dependent on the auxiliary starter winding etc, as its inherent stall torque is otherwise essentially zero, unlike a 3-phase machine which can generate full torque over the whole speed range, notwithstanding the need for cooling air flow at low speeds.
Murray
Edited By Muzzer on 31/12/2014 12:38:36