Vic
Grossly oversimplifying vacuum cleaners pick up dust and debris by entraining it in a fast moving airstream. When the airstream enters a relatively large container its velocity drops sharply so the air can no longer carry the the dust and debris so it drops out of suspension. The smaller the dust particles the slower the air has to go before it drops out and the longer such dropping out takes. Really small dust will float in still air! So you need to be a bit more cunning to collect that.
Conventional vacuum cleaners use a filter bag to remove the small dust from the exit airstream. The smaller the holes the smaller the dust that can be removed but the faster the bag clogs reducing airflow. All vacuum cleaners have vastly overrun high speed motors cooled by the exit airflow so there is a limit to how effective bag filtration can be before airflow through the filter is reduced so much that the motor is at risk of meltdown. Most bag cleaners have a temperature sensor which shuts things down before the motor melts if you run with a clogged bag.
Oversimplifying cyclone systems use momentum, swirl and velocity gradients to separate out small dust particles. They don't do anything for larger particles which drop out of suspension due to the usual airspeed reduction when the air goes from a small hose into a large bin. Still oversimplifying a major issue with cyclones it that they actually speed up some of the airflow so to work properly you need a much larger collection bin the get the same speed drop to loose all the other rubbish. Which is why proper cyclones always sit on top of a big bin. Within reason the bigger the better. If you put a proper cyclone on a conventional vacuum cleaner the device ends up too large due to the bin volume needed. Zebethyal uses a 30 litre bin after the cyclone, which is not untypical for a respectably decent system. No way will a bin that size go on a conventional floor sweeping vacuum cleaner. Cyclone and bin size is inversely proportional to the smallest dust particle removed. For really tiny stuff things get huge. Which is why woodworking shops need big floor standing systems to shift the minuscule particles that are a really serious cancer risk.
Regrettably the Dyston is an engineering con on the same level that Amstrad "Hi-Fi" was. It looks like a cyclone. It sort of behaves like a cyclone and separates general house dust pretty well but I seriously doubt if much of that is due to real cyclone performance. I suspect that a set of cunning baffles would work just as well. All the fine stuff sticks to the "cyclone" walls anyway and has to be wiped off. Tried one once on fine wood dust and the HEPA filter blocked up in nothing flat with lots of dusty air whizzing out. Getting covered in dust when emptying the container is an experience I can well do without.
Clive