Posted by Michael Gilligan on 03/08/2016 22:59:17:
Posted by Ian Phillips on 03/08/2016 22:40:44:
I disagree that the part was too hard when it was manufactured. It has survived millions of operating cycles over 40 years without failing. Because its tough (read hard and rigid) it would not have flexed very much, but millions of 'not very much' have eventually culminated in its fatigue.
.
That is your prerogative, Ian … But it seems obvious, even at this distance, that it has suffered a brittle fracture, rather than a fatigue failure.
That said; I will stop interfering.
MichaelG.
Michael
Were probably getting into semantics here but on a MEW level there is not a lot of difference between brittle fracture and metal fatigue. I Googled both,
Fatigue failure is defined as the tendency of a material to fracture by means of progressive brittle cracking under repeated alternating or cyclic stresses of an intensity considerably below the normal strength.
Brittle fracture is the fracture of a metal or other material without appreciable prior plastic deformation. It is a break in a brittle piece of metal which failed because stress exceeded cohesion.
I dont believe everything I read on the web but looking at images of fractured surfaces the ones my Bosch part show that the crack has progressed over time.
I certainly dont regard your comments as interfering, its all grist to the mill and just this one thread shows just how varied the grist (knowledge) is!
Ian P