Hi Ray,
I'm coming in rather late here, and certainly go along with the above comments about colour balance etc.
What I thought would be of use to you, goes something like this :-
Many a picture is spoiled in low light conditions due to camera shake, where the image is smeared, and there being a limited depth of field, at wide aperture. Having a uniform amount of light usually produces a nicer result, but …
There are two solutions which come to mind. The first is the use of flash, and the second (in a tight environment such as an exhibition hall), is to use a monopod, or better still a tripod. The latter is rather cumbersome hence the idea of using a monopod. If neither of these are possible, then propping the camera on something more rigid can work well.
With flash however, camera shake is (usually) not a problem, unless the camera has software for balancing the flash output with available light. Then you get two images. A sharper one from the flash, and a secondary image from the available light. Without a steady hand or something to support the camera on, these two images can appear separate.
Although a flash image can be very much sharper, the fall off in light intensity varies with the square of the distance, so that detail closest to the camera is illuminated more brightly than detail further away.
I have found the best results with flash is to have the flash unit off the camera, held out at arms length and somewhat above the subject. A bit tricky at first, but worth the effort.
There are other factors, but I think that will be enough.
Good luck,
Sam