Interesting. Two things bother me about this sort of publicity:
1. All these big court cases have been in the U.S. and are typically tried by people who have no understanding of science.
2. There have been many studies to try to establish a link between talc and ovarian cancer. Some have concluded that there is no link. Some have concluded that there is statistically a slight increase in the risk which is already very low. Some have concluded that nothing is proven and more work needs to be done.
Now, if you are a researcher working on such a study who will become unemployed if the study is concluded you will , of course, want to suggest that more work needs to be done. This is a common problem with the way research grants are often awarded and scientists are employed on short term contracts.
Russell