Posted by not done it yet on 01/10/2017 07:56:42:
Should we be guessing? I don't think so…
I think Michael's offerings are in the same spirit as mine, though he's better at it than I am.
My posts are intended to help, and, I try to ensure they are evidence based. I indicate quality issues by using words like 'guess', 'think', 'reckon', 'risk', 'probably' or 'suggest' so the reader can make his own mind up. For example:
'Guess' means I've thought about the problem and spotted what might be a reasonable way ahead. I'm not claiming to be right, and won't be surprised if someone else comes up with a better answer later on.
'Think' means I'm more confident but still not certain. For example, I may have identified a mathematical formula and misapplied it or botched the calculation. I am delighted to receive corrections!
Where I'm on more solid ground – not relying on my faulty memory, logic and diagnostic powers – I quote references so that someone else can check them. References are good, but not necessarily conclusive. The interweb is a mix of good and bad. Books can be out of date. Again, I'm very pleased to be put right.
I try very hard to avoid generalisations, over simplification, and drawing conclusions from limited data. For example, I although I personally have never seen a fatal road accident, I do believe that they happen.
One feature of engineering I like is making improvements. That involves open exchange of ideas and experiences. Keep those posts coming, they're all good.
Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 01/10/2017 11:45:15