machining a gun barrel

Advert

machining a gun barrel

Home Forums General Questions machining a gun barrel

Viewing 5 posts - 26 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #93717
    Steve Withnell
    Participant
      @stevewithnell34426

      Clive – I didn't think they called in the black powder vintage hand guns?

      Advert
      #93719
      Ian S C
      Participant
        @iansc

        When this thread started, I thought here we go, someonesgoing to say STOP, you can't talk about this, its naughty, worse than porn, but I was happy to see that those ones have stayed away because this is quite interesting, specially the link to the Scottish Pistols. Ian S C

        #93738
        Clive Hartland
        Participant
          @clivehartland94829

          Hi Steve, the only Black Powder gun I had was a Beretta O/U shotgun, when I took it to the skeet range everybody wanted a go and it used up all my powder very quickly. It smashed the clays every time but was slow to reload and made lots of smoke.I did for a while use Pyrodex powder, a Black Powder substitue but again it was expensive. It was also very good on Pheasants, patterning very well and the dog did not like the boom instead of the bang of a cartridge gun.

          Your right that they did not call in the B/P guns but the following was very low, now they use cut short rifle type guns with pistol grips to get around the pistol ban.

          Clive

          #93753
          mgj
          Participant
            @mgj

            Jon you are right about hammer forging. I believe Mannlicher leave the rather pronounced spiral on – possibly as a trademark. Watching machine gun barrels beign hammer forged at Enfield, again that took what, less than a minute.

            Clive one of the advantages of decent quality black powder is its consistency. Its actually a more consistent propellant than smokeless, and its a lot easier ot set it alight consistently. As a consequence a lot of black powder ammo is very consistent indeed. The problem comes with the business of spin – the generally longer bullets are highly spun for stability, and because of the lower velocities the launch angle or line of departure is realativley steep. Combine htat with being heavily overspun for stability downrange and hte thing locks gyroscopically at a rather awkward angle upward angle relative to the trajectory which is tedious. Tends to fly nose up generating slender body lift as a result of the crossflow, and all sorts. So its not the ancient propellant at all which is darned good – its actually the physics of older lower velocity ammunition whihc tended to limit performance.

            #93901
            Niloch
            Participant
              @niloch

              Youtube shows a huge selection of naval armaments. Try, for example, typing The Naval Gun Factory 1952 into the search field.

            Viewing 5 posts - 26 through 30 (of 30 total)
            • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

            Advert

            Latest Replies

            Home Forums General Questions Topics

            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

            View full reply list.

            Advert

            Newsletter Sign-up