diameter calculation

Advert

diameter calculation

Home Forums Help and Assistance! (Offered or Wanted) diameter calculation

Viewing 5 posts - 76 through 80 (of 80 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #433299
    SillyOldDuffer
    Moderator
      @sillyoldduffer
      Posted by Michael Gilligan on 14/10/2019 15:02:46:

      Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 14/10/2019 10:09:03:

      […]

      For the record, my comments about extreme accuracy of calculation relate to the properties of Polar and Cartesian coordinates, not to Paul's original question.

      By asking about a practical problem, Paul opened the door to some interesting mathematical solutions and related problems. I questioned the assertion that Polar Coordinates are intrinsically more accurate than Cartesian Coordinates by suggesting both systems are equivalent provided the calculations are done to a sufficiently large number of decimal places. (Not convinced this is correct and Michael has set me some homework!) I wasn't suggesting Paul or anyone else needs to do hard sums in their workshops!

      […]

      .

      .

      For the avoidance of doubt, Dave

      What I intended to assert was not that “Polar Coordinates are intrinsically more accurate than Cartesian Coordinates”

      But that ”for situations where Polar Coordinates properly specify the geometry, their use is intrinsically more accurate than a conversion to Cartesian Coordinates”

      … It’s a subtle difference, but important.

      MichaelG.

      Arrgh! '… It’s a subtle difference, but important.' Certainly is. It's so easy to misread other people's posts! I am kicking myself…

      blush

      Ta,

      Dave

      Advert
      #433510
      Gary Wooding
      Participant
        @garywooding25363
        Posted by duncan webster on 13/10/2019 23:55:52:
        ……….. but just to be pedantic, don't you need to use the cosine rule to find angle C to start the whole thing off rather than sin rule

        Yes, you're right.

        #433680
        Chris Gunn
        Participant
          @chrisgunn36534

          I am still struggling with the average of 1 and 2 being 2

          Chris Gunn

          #433688
          Michael Gilligan
          Participant
            @michaelgilligan61133
            Posted by Chris Gunn on 17/10/2019 14:12:05:

            I am still struggling with the average of 1 and 2 being 2

            Chris Gunn

            .

            I think he rounded 1.5 up … on the basis that 1 and 2 were expressed as integers.

            MichaelG.

            #433691
            Chris Gunn
            Participant
              @chrisgunn36534

              Thanks Michael, I knew I could rely on you.

              CG

            Viewing 5 posts - 76 through 80 (of 80 total)
            • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

            Advert

            Latest Replies

            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

            View full reply list.

            Advert

            Newsletter Sign-up