Posted by Neil Wyatt on 02/12/2018 12:41:02:
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 02/12/2018 10:41:58:
I wonder if population density is against you too. I've a notion that a surge effecting 1000 households would be much reduced by their collective protections compared with the same surge reaching a hamlet of 10 homes.
Dave
Also, if you have a density of 0 house per km2 (say) com[pared with 1000, then if a house gets hit its 100 time more likely to be you.

It's not often I get the chance to correct Neil's maths, but with zero houses shouldn't the answer be infinity more times more likely?
90% of statistics are wrong…

Dave
PS. More likely Neil's mistake is a typo, not his maths. His most recent MEW editorial has a 'their/there' mix-up and I'd bet big money he knows the difference. It's amazing what the eye skates over whilst proof-reading!