Posted by Kiwi Bloke on 29/06/2020 07:36:21:
I suppose the rather unhelpful answer is that the axial positioning repeatability is as consistent as all the variables relevant to the fitting-up procedure. I would think that those (eg torque applied to draw-bar or equivalent, lubrication, etc) would swamp inconsistencies attributable to joint characteristics, material distortion, etc.. This assumes the mating parts are well-made, of course.
Experiment seems to confirm this.
I cleaned my MT2 collet chuck tapers and pushed it hard enough into the spindle socket to take it's own weight plus drawbar. Tightened the drawbar with mild finger pressure and zeroed a DTI before using spanners to apply about another 3/4 quarter turn, at which point definite effort was needed, though I could have gone further. (I avoid overtightening tapers because getting them out becomes violent.)
Tightening the drawbar with spanners lifted the ER32 collect chuck 0.35mm. So linear reset of a taper isn't particularly good because more or less pressure on the drawbar effects it by tenths of a millimetre. I suspect reset would be better if the tapers were consistently cleaned and a torque wrench used. Unfortunately I don't have one.
Dave