For those little fiddly bits perhaps

Advert

For those little fiddly bits perhaps

Home Forums Manual machine tools For those little fiddly bits perhaps

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #62225
    Paul Boscott
    Participant
      @paulboscott25817
      Advert
      #11730
      Paul Boscott
      Participant
        @paulboscott25817
        #62227
        James fortin
        Participant
          @jamesfortin46829
          if you like that kind of stuff instructables has lots of offbeat and intriguing projects
           
          james 
           
          incase the link dosent work
           

          Edited By James fortin on 11/01/2011 14:00:54

          #62228
          The Merry Miller
          Participant
            @themerrymiller

            I certainly would be interested once they could do rapid-prototyping in metal’

            #62229
            John Haine
            Participant
              @johnhaine32865
              #62230
              Dinosaur Engineer
              Participant
                @dinosaurengineer
                This technology has been around for at least 15 years for industrial rapid protyping.
                Obviously the equipment has reduced in price dramatically. It is quite facinating to see as the layers build up.I would imagine that the layer thickness resolution is now much better than it was when it was first introduced.

                Edited By Dinosaur Engineer on 11/01/2011 16:09:32

                #62232
                JasonB
                Moderator
                  @jasonb
                  Posted by The Merry Miller on 11/01/2011 14:11:24:
                  I certainly would be interested once they could do rapid-prototyping in metal’
                   
                   You just need to put a shrinkage allowance into your CAD file and out pops a pattern ready for lost wax/foam casting, so not too far off.
                   
                  J
                  #62237
                  The Merry Miller
                  Participant
                    @themerrymiller
                    I think the layer thickness is down to about 0.5 mm now.
                     
                    Ten years ago when I was using the process it it was about 1.5/2.0 mm
                  Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
                  • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                  Advert

                  Latest Replies

                  Home Forums Manual machine tools Topics

                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                  View full reply list.

                  Advert

                  Newsletter Sign-up