Going back a long way to Mike's comment about Perkins having a gas turbine powered truck running in the 70s, and as a deviation from the thread.
I worked for them from early 1973 until retiring in late 2003, and never heard of such a vehicle.
Over the years that I knew the company (starting contact with regard to Fuel injection Equipment, in 1964) Perkins looked at many different types of prime mover, from attempts at a constant horsepower diesel, two strokes and so on, but the conventional four stroke diesel engine was always the commercially and technically most viable.The only gas turbine which they produced was before my time, as a four man portable fire pump. The gas turbine was made under licence from Solar. (We have one in our Perkins Heritage Group collection)
By the 1970s, the nearly constant horsepower Differential Diesel Engine had been abandoned, so that was unlikely to be what he heard. (Strange to hear the engine speed falling as the vehicle accelerated!)
What Mike may have heard whistling was an engine pressure charged by a "Comprex" unit.
This was investigated as an alternative to the turbocharger, consisting of a rotating tube nest, alternatively connected to the exhaust and induction system. Again, found to be unsuitable.
Returning to the thread, pure electric vehicles are non polluting at point of use, but how is the electricity to be generated if the vehicle is to be truly non polluting?
For local use, they are the way to reduce air pollution (ignoring any pollution from the production of, and assembly of, components)
The emphasis has to be on development of batteries capable of providing adequate range for cars, and more importantly for goods and large passenger carrying vehicles. AND the resulting vehicles have to priced such that they are affordable. UNLESS everyone is prepared to change their lifestyle quite markedly, which I very much doubt.
Howard (now minus typos)
Edited By Howard Lewis on 20/08/2017 21:30:35