Posted by Lee Reynolds 1 on 01/08/2022 10:45:39:
…The 4140 discussion suggests to me that Australia uses the AISI system of steel grading (which is why I couldn't find an AUS one). The use of the term 4140 is therefore completely normal.
…
Not sure anything about naming steels is normal! Most steel making nations had, and maybe still have, their own naming systems, and repeated attempts to rationalise them have mostly failed. AISI is well-known in the USA, less so abroad, but we all have tables of equivalents: if in Australia you want AISI 4140, BS970-659M15, or SAE J403 there's probably a local equivalent.
In the UK we still buy steel using the "Emergency Number" system introduced during WW2, even though the system was replaced in 1972! My local supplier looks blank if I ask for 220M07 but smiles if I ask EN1A. As no-one makes EN1A, he's selling me 220M07 or similar, and someone in the supply chain relabelled it to suit conservative Brits! The metal could have come from anywhere. More likely Chinese or EU made than American, but it might be Indian, Russian, German, South Korean, Turkish, Brazilian or whatever…
The naming problem got worse with the internet because folk around the world specify what they know, probably not realising their understanding doesn't travel well. Faced with an unfamiliar specification number, you have to find an equivalent that your local stockist keeps. My local metal retailers aren't switched on to equivalents so I do my own research. Fortunately the internet is good at identifying alternatives that a local shop can supply.
Frankly, it's a mess!
Dave