Posted by Nick Clarke 3 on 06/07/2022 08:54:55:
…the software has been bought and paid for so why not? – but this is not the case. A purchaser purchases a licence to do only what the supplier say they can do with the software – it is not owned by you.
I would be interested to know whether this is, in fact, the case. I use Free software these days. When I bought software, I think that there was a Dire Warning on the disc's package seal saying something to the effect that by breaking the seal, one agreed to a whole raft of conditions laid down by the manufacturer. But, at the time one broke the seal, one could not have knowledge of those conditions. Manufacturers like to restrict individual freedom for all sorts of reasons (generally to try to duck responsibility or for their commercial advantage), but such restrictions may not be allowed by the law of the land. Does a hammer have packaging warning the purchaser that it must not be used to commit murder? I suspect that British law allows a purchaser of a physical item to do pretty much what he will with it, provided that it is not against the law of the land. Such commercial licences are not enshrined in British law. If a manufacturer withdraws a purchaser's right of enjoyment of their purchase, without, for instance, warning the purchaser that that right may be enjoyed for only a limited time, is this legal?
I admit that I have no special legal knowledge, but I'm very sceptical of manufacturers' manoeuverings. I expect SOD or Mr Gilligan will be along soon with an authoritative opinion…