Reading that percentage-claim carefully, does that mean the batteries’ degradation is like that of the cars’ monetary values: steep initially then fairly flat for some years? Weasely things, are percentages…..
Some electric cars now do recover whatever waste heat they can from the motors, for heating. I do not know its efficacy but imagine it cannot be very high or regular.
Dave –
Ironically perhaps, while early-20C Londoners were pleased to see the end (no not that end) of equine incontinence, the noise and noisome emissions from the new-fangled, petroleum-spirit fuelled cars led to those being banned from the Royal Parks.
However, the quiet, clean battery-electric cars of the time were allowed there!
Indeed, there was rapid development of such cars and light lorries in Edwardian times; in Britain, France, Germany and America at least. Paris City Council even operated over 100 Battery-Electric refuse lorries, built by Fram.
The developments seemed to involve a lot imaginative wheel re-inventing; rather as had the development of the steam-engine; but there must have been a burgeoning market for the vehicles. So it was most likely what we call “range anxiety” that saw those early BEVs off, rather than their technical aspects. Owners had to use their own chargers and mains-electricity was not yet universal and standard. Hence battery-electric propulsion was probably better suited to commercial goods-vehicles than to private cars – somewhat opposite to our situation more than 100 years later.
Drawings etc. of those early electric LGVs (“Light” – up to about 3 Ton) survive and may provide an interesting model-engineering subject replicating reality far more closely than battery-driven miniatures of Diesel lorries.
By no means all of the common illnesses among townies of the time were from ‘oss doo-doos, though that can’t have helped. Many town residents, especially in the poorer areas, lived with very basic sanitation and washing facilities indeed; and in Winter especially, in a near-constant miasma of coal smoke.
.
Noel –
Are you asking Fulmen, Winter or Summer, and by which route?
The E6 crosses a major plateau called Dovrefjell about mid-way between the two cities, which are a long way apart. An alternative route some way to the East lessens the hill-climbing.
Fulmen evidently will know better than I about electric car range and charging availability there.
Though elsewhere I have learnt that the Norwegians have embraced battery-electric cars much more than we have in the UK, despite their far harsher Winters and many more Very Big Hills. Not so much steep as very long climbs.
Dovrefjell is also crossed by the main railway line which looked at from a car on the adjacent road, must have some of the steepest gradients on any such line anywhere. It is overhead electrified, and just beyond a summit so pronounced it slightly hump-backs the train itself, both road and railway descend a valley so impressively deep and steep you wonder how on Earth an ordinary railway-line can possibly operate in it… but it does, and very effectively!
I may be wrong but gained the impression Diesel-hauled goods trains use that alternative route, with gentler climbing. Norway is roughly saw-tooth profiled in cross-section, higher down the coastal side; with very long N-S and S-N valleys. Last time I was in the country we did return via that Easterly route (by road – and petroleum-derivative).