Posted by Ian Skeldon 2 on 09/01/2021 11:46:47:
The best way to think of Hermes is to see it as a typo, it is actually Herpes and any contact should be avoided at all costs.
Seriously, they lose things, they lie, they have no idea, I am mildly impressed that their workforce can find their way into work, everything else ends up in the wrong place 
In the interest of balance, my daughter must be well over a thousand parcels over the last 10 years and has never had a problem with Hermes or the others. And the Hermes people who deliver to my doorstep are all normal human beings – friendly and efficient.
Last time we had a problem it was one of mine, from Warco about 5 years ago. Warco replaced it with no fuss. Doesn't mean Hermes or Warco are paragons of virtue, absolutely incapable of making a mistake or never themselves being victims of an accident.
Chaps on the forum do love a brand-name, imagining that large organisations handling transactions by the million can be universally damned or praised on the basis of a few personal experiences.
In the real world performance depends hugely on local circumstances, making 'big picture' assessments untrustworthy. For example the Post Office are doing well in my area, but 30 miles away my sister is suffering late and intermittent deliveries. She knows an employee who explained my local Sorting Office is a spacious modern facility, while hers is in a cramped older building scheduled to be replaced because it's too small, and now it's struggling due to covid. Staff are forced together and in consequence have a high sickness rate. And the need to keep people physically apart means the office can't process at full volume, causing backlogs build up.
Samsaranda mentioned another problem with brand-names: he's noticed Amazon parcels being delivered by Hermes. Me too, and other unexpected arrivals indicating they are sharing the load. Fact is, carriers aren't obliged to shift stuff themselves – it's not unusual for them to offload work to a rival, though Covid makes it more likely. Not a new idea. Fans of pre-nationalisation railways will have noticed goods wagons belonging to many different owners being pulled by the same engine. A mix of privately owned and railway owned wagons. This picture, taken in Birmingham, shows a jumble of Midland Railway, GWR, LNR and LBSC wagons, plus at least 4 privately owned wagons:

The railway system didn't usually take a load then return the owners empty wagon. Instead, it allowed empty wagons to be used by another customer, who would pay the owner via the railway company. Wagons were despatched in the general direction of home earning money on the way.
General purpose wagons could take years to return to their owners, who in the meantime would use someone else's wagons. Considerably cheaper, but who is to blame if a loan wagon breaks down en-route and the cargo is delayed, rots, or is nicked? Answer: insurance. It's impossible to guarantee delivery, it's only possible to arrange some form of recompense.
For that reason I agree strongly with Paul L: 'The acid test though is how they handle the failures. In my experience companies that deliberately make it difficult for their customers to contact them effectively, are not the best ones to do business with.'
Dave