Plumbing question

Advert

Plumbing question

Home Forums Locomotives Plumbing question

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #440878
    Manofkent
    Participant
      @manofkent

      I wonder if any of you clever people out there can help me with a question.

      Imagine a pipe 3/8 dia, which for a length is reduced to 1/4 dia, and then back to the original 3/8 dia .

      My question is would the flow at the end of the pipe be the same as if it were 3/8 all the way through? Let's assume only water pressure from a tender.

      Originally I thought not, but someone has confused me now by suggesting that the volume would be the same in either example, because the pressure or speed would rise in the smaller pipe to compensate.

      Is this reasonably correct?

      Many thanks in advance

      .

      John

      .

      Advert
      #1889
      Manofkent
      Participant
        @manofkent
        #440879
        not done it yet
        Participant
          @notdoneityet

          No, of course not. Would a 1/4 diameter pipe provide the same flow as a 3/8 diameter pipe? Just forget the two combined for a few seconds!

          #440882
          John Haine
          Participant
            @johnhaine32865

            Suppose it was 12 inches diameter reduced to 1/4 – kinda makes it obvious.

            #440894
            BC Prof
            Participant
              @bcprof

              No. I it was true the water companies could fit reducers to water mains and run 1mm diameter pipes

              #440896
              Bill Davies 2
              Participant
                @billdavies2

                Perhaps the other person has missed the important point you mention, i.e., the flow would be the same in both cases.

                He or she is right that the flow on either side is the same as in the narrow part of the tube, but rather like electrical circuits, there is a resistance. The higher the resistance, the lower the current flow. Old electrical books make the analogy between water and electrical flow, hence use of the word 'current'.

                In the case of no hole in the smaller tube, there would be no flow, so could we call that an insulator?

                #440901
                Manofkent
                Participant
                  @manofkent

                  Thanks all.

                  I guess the confusion is that it would be ok the other way, ie small pipe to big and back to a small again. In that case the flow would be the smaller pipe rate.

                  Thanks

                  John

                  #440909
                  Speedy Builder5
                  Participant
                    @speedybuilder5

                    Re work the question. Is a 1/4" pipe sufficient to deliver water from a tender to the …….. whatever.

                    BobH

                    #440911
                    not done it yet
                    Participant
                      @notdoneityet
                      Posted by John Hilton on 09/12/2019 15:49:21:

                      Thanks all.

                      I guess the confusion is that it would be ok the other way, ie small pipe to big and back to a small again. In that case the flow would be the smaller pipe rate.

                      Thanks

                      John

                      Noo, not even that is correct. Imagine half a mile of 1/4 pipe on the ends of a foot long piece of 3/8 diameter pipe. Now consider the lengths reversed. The difference in flow would be like considering a 2 foot length of small pipe with a half mile length under the same pressure. One may not notice much difference with short lengths of pipe but considering extremes of length should make it obvious that there will be a difference, however small.

                      #440912
                      Brian Oldford
                      Participant
                        @brianoldford70365

                        Those with the slightest knowledge of electricity will recall water flow being analogous to electrical flow. Now apply Ohm's Law to your pipework.

                        #440924
                        Robert Atkinson 2
                        Participant
                          @robertatkinson2

                          It depends on what the water source is.

                          If it's constant pressure source like a head of water or non -positive displacement pump then the flow will be less with the smaller section in place.

                          If it is a constant flow source e.g. a positive displacement pump, then the flow will not reduce with the restriction in place. However the pressure upstream of the restriction will be higher. This works up to the point where the pipe bursts or pump fails.

                          Robert G8RPI.

                          #440928
                          not done it yet
                          Participant
                            @notdoneityet

                            Yes, Robert, but here we are following the OP’s “Let's assume only water pressure from a tender” scenario in his first post. As Brian so rightly says, use the Ohm’s Law analogy. In this case the potential difference across the ends of the pipe is constant.

                            Edited By not done it yet on 09/12/2019 17:37:19

                            #440951
                            Robert Atkinson 2
                            Participant
                              @robertatkinson2

                              I covered the tender (non-constant flow) case in my post, what is your point?

                              If we are restricting this to tender ppework why are you talking about about half mile long pipes? If point is picking at other peoples posts, there is no "potential difference" (voltage) across the pipe and even the pressure drop is not constant, it will vary as the water level in the tender drops, reducing the available pressure head and flow rate.

                              #440961
                              Maurice Taylor
                              Participant
                                @mauricetaylor82093

                                If the flow into the pipe at 3/8 end is 10 litre/min ,the flow through the 1/4 pipe will be 10 litres/min,as will the flow out of end of 3/8 pipe.Prividing there is enough pressure to get it through ,think fire hose same flow out of 1/2inch nozzle as 3 inch hose.

                                #440963
                                Richard –
                                Participant
                                  @richard-3

                                  Why throughout hydraulics do me make use of flow restrictors to slow components down ?

                                  #440976
                                  Paul Lousick
                                  Participant
                                    @paullousick59116

                                    It is true that "If the flow into the pipe at 3/8 end is 10 litre/min ,the flow through the 1/4 pipe will be 10 litres/min,as will the flow out of end of 3/8 pipe". The 1/4" pipe is the restrictor that controls the volume thru the pipe. Inclease this and the flow will be greater then 10 litres/min.

                                    A 1/2" dia garden hose connected to a 1/2" tap which is connected to a 1/2" water supply pipe is another example. When the tap is fully open there is a 1/2" bore thru all items and at 50psi you will get about 30 gallons/min but as the tap is closed (similar to going thru a smaller intermediate pipe) the volume of water out of the end reduces. The pressure will also be reduced slightly because of the extra friction. Adding more bends in the pipe run or reduced bore diameter in connector fittings will also reduce the flow and pressure.

                                    Paul.

                                    #440994
                                    Hopper
                                    Participant
                                      @hopper

                                      Flow rate is proportional to the fourth power of the pipe radius times the pressure. See Poiseulle's Law.

                                      So if the pipe radius is decreased, flow decreases. Unless, unless, pressure is raised proportionately at the same time. Which depends on the type and capacity of pump used etc etc etc.

                                      So a pump with a regulated output pressure (eg hydraulic system) , or a header tank with a constant head (eg mains water pressure), will flow less through a smaller pipe.

                                      But a pump that is capable of increasing the supply pressure (while maintaining the flow rate) could pump the same volume through the smaller pipe as the larger pipe.

                                       

                                       

                                       

                                       

                                      Edited By Hopper on 10/12/2019 10:04:18

                                      #440998
                                      Anonymous
                                        Posted by Hopper on 10/12/2019 09:51:48:

                                        Flow rate is proportional to the fourth power of the pipe radius times the pressure. See Poiseulle's Law.

                                        Only true if the fluid is incompressible and Newtonian, and the flow is laminar. Water is a good approximation to the first two conditions, but we don't know if the flow is laminar without knowing the Reynold's number.

                                        Andrew

                                        #441174
                                        Hopper
                                        Participant
                                          @hopper
                                          Posted by Andrew Johnston on 10/12/2019 10:04:38:

                                          Posted by Hopper on 10/12/2019 09:51:48:

                                          Flow rate is proportional to the fourth power of the pipe radius times the pressure. See Poiseulle's Law.

                                          Only true if the fluid is incompressible and Newtonian, and the flow is laminar. Water is a good approximation to the first two conditions, but we don't know if the flow is laminar without knowing the Reynold's number.

                                          Andrew

                                          Assuming for our hypothetical example that all other factors are constant, eg viscosity, pipe length, laminar flow, whatever. Otherwise we will end up in the realm of angels dancing on heads of pins, yet once again. And we certainly wouldn't want that, I'm sure. angel

                                          #441179
                                          SillyOldDuffer
                                          Moderator
                                            @sillyoldduffer
                                            Posted by Hopper on 11/12/2019 10:04:41:

                                            Posted by Andrew Johnston on 10/12/2019 10:04:38:

                                            Posted by Hopper on 10/12/2019 09:51:48:

                                            Flow rate is proportional to the fourth power of the pipe radius times the pressure. See Poiseulle's Law.

                                            Only true if …

                                            Andrew

                                            Assuming for our hypothetical example that all other factors are constant, eg viscosity, pipe length, laminar flow, whatever. Otherwise we will end up in the realm of angels dancing on heads of pins, yet once again. And we certainly wouldn't want that, I'm sure. angel

                                            Too late! I thought of asking a moderator to change the thread's title from 'Plumbing Question' to 'Rocket Science', because it's about Hydrodynamics rather than pipework. For example, these constrictions all behave much the same at low pressure and very differently at high pressures:

                                            pipes.jpg

                                            Even in plumbing it can matter because it costs money to pump large masses of water through badly designed pipes. Ever more critical to get flow right in a ship's hull, aircraft wing, jet-engine, and rocket engine. The latter really is complicated. For a given energy content, what is the best form of output nozzle? For example, an over tight nozzle in an ordinary Guy Fawkes rocket will cause it to explode rather than fly, and an over wide nozzle will have it burn out without moving.

                                            Firework rockets can be made 'about right' in a shed by experiment, crude methods are good enough. Designing a rocket motor for a guided missile or a space-craft is much more demanding – truly rocket science!

                                            Dave

                                            #441191
                                            Howard Lewis
                                            Participant
                                              @howardlewis46836

                                              Folks, are we not making mountains out of molehills?

                                              The theoretical discussions are interesting, but do not do much to help the OP. The effects of turbulence at the change of section may be interesting, but are hardly vital in carrying a small volume of water down a short pipe, as the case in point.. There have already been references to Rocket Science, which this is not.

                                              We do not need a dissertation on the change of viscosity of water with temperature..

                                              The OP was asking about a pipe between the tender and the locomotive.

                                              The pressure available to promote flow is going to be of the order of a few inches of water, or probably less than 200 mm.

                                              The pressure differential may be increased by the sub atmospheric effects of the injector that it feeds.

                                              But basically, it all comes back to "Will a 1/4" pipe reduce the flow through a 3/8" pipe"?

                                              The simple answer, in these circumstances is a common sense "YES".

                                              As the late Rudi Mischetlager used to say "Common sense is not that common"

                                              Remember the motto of the amateur radio world, KISS, "Keep It Simple Stupid"

                                              Howard

                                              #441200
                                              Manofkent
                                              Participant
                                                @manofkent

                                                Wow. I am reading this with great interest as the OP!

                                                I certainly have enough info to blind my accuser with science!

                                                I did wonder – just to compound the issue – would we expect different results (within reason) if the subject was a gas which could be compressed?

                                                keep them coming!

                                                John

                                                #441206
                                                Howard Lewis
                                                Participant
                                                  @howardlewis46836

                                                  For the same pressure differential between inlet and outlet, the limit on flow will, be the smaller pipe.

                                                  The longer the small diameter section is, the more the flow will decrease, because of the friction with the pipe wall. This will apply to all fluids.

                                                  If a gas is at pressure at the inlet to the minor diameter, and there is minimal back pressure at the outlet, the gas will expand, decrease in temperature. If it expands, the volume will increase.

                                                  The drop in temperature during expansion is used to liquify gases, reducing it to below its critical temperature, where recompression can liquify it.

                                                  Witness the nozzle of a CO2 fire extinguisher, which will become coated with "frost", because of the drop in temperature, condensing and freezing moisture in the surrounding air.

                                                  Gases will behave differently, depending on whether they are above or below the critical temperature, and not like liquids which are only VERY slightly compressible, when subjected to high pressures.

                                                  Howard. .

                                                  #441217
                                                  SillyOldDuffer
                                                  Moderator
                                                    @sillyoldduffer
                                                    Posted by Howard Lewis on 11/12/2019 12:14:16:

                                                    Folks, are we not making mountains out of molehills?

                                                    The theoretical discussions are interesting, but do not do much to help the OP. …

                                                    The OP was asking about a pipe between the tender and the locomotive.

                                                    The pressure available to promote flow is going to be of the order of a few inches of water, or probably less than 200 mm.

                                                    The pressure differential may be increased by the sub atmospheric effects of the injector that it feeds.

                                                    But basically, it all comes back to "Will a 1/4" pipe reduce the flow through a 3/8" pipe"?

                                                    The simple answer, in these circumstances is a common sense "YES".

                                                    As the late Rudi Mischetlager used to say "Common sense is not that common"

                                                    Remember the motto of the amateur radio world, KISS, "Keep It Simple Stupid"

                                                    Howard

                                                    Well, it depends. I prefer Einstein's 'Make everything as simple as possible but not simpler'. He also said 'If you can’t explain it, you don’t understand it well enough.'

                                                    Personally I incline to argue there is no such thing as common sense. Here's a few definitions to choose from. Common Sense is:

                                                    • What I think you should know without any argument! (Depends on me not being an idiot.)
                                                    • A notion shared by many people. (Depends on other people not being idiots.)
                                                    • Anything that might be reasonably expected. (Depends on what's meant by 'reasonable'. In English Law, decided by precedence and court cases.)
                                                    • Making sound practical decisions with no need for specialised knowledge or understanding. (Depends on the idea that experts know nothing, education is unnecessary, and experience valueless.)
                                                    • The basic practical knowledge and judgment needed to survive. (Assumes newborn babes can survive on their own.)
                                                    • Just as good as someone else's moral position. (Assumes it's not necessary to understand morality or ethics.)

                                                    I'm not sure John's question has been answered correctly, though I think Hopper and Robert both correctly identify the main consideration, which is the difference between a tender that's just a tank, and one containing a pump. One assumption is the tender gravity feeds water to an injector, equally valid is a tender containing a force pump for directly injecting high-pressure water into the boiler. Maybe both are wrong, could be the tender is used to fill a tea-urn on the back.

                                                    If John wanted a simple practical answer to the effect of a choke on water flowing under gravity, easy enough to do the experiment. The experiment would also find the actual relationship between choke and output volume, useful for answering a question like 'will the choked pipe enough flow to allow an injector to fill the boiler'? A rather harder question is, 'how much longer will it take to fill a boiler with a force pump if the pipe is constrained?' In the latter case, the smaller pipe may be necessary to manage the high-pressure involved, not just a casual feature.

                                                    While practical skills are high value, they are strongly reinforced by effective theory. I'm impressed by Lord Kelvin, (physicist as smart as Newton and Einstein) who is alleged to have said: 'if you can't put numbers on it, it ain't worth sh1t!'

                                                    devil

                                                    Dave

                                                    #441232
                                                    SillyOldDuffer
                                                    Moderator
                                                      @sillyoldduffer

                                                      As a picture is worth a thousand words:

                                                      hydraulic.jpg

                                                      If the tap on the open tank is cracked open, the amount of water flowing out of the tank will be constrained. If the tap is fully opened, then more water flows but the volume is limited by the water pressure and the diameter of the outlet pipe.

                                                      In the pressured tank, something rather different happens. If the piston in the large cylinder is pushed down a fixed volume of water is transferred to the small piston, which moves much further inside its cylinder. And in reverse, pushing the small piston down moves a fixed volume of water back into the large cylinder, which pisto moves a small distance. While the presence of a choke in the pipe makes no difference to the flow, or to the movement of either piston, it does make a difference to the pressure!

                                                      Open tanks are typical of domestic water systems: water pressure at the tap is usually obtained by gravity feed from a reservoir on higher ground, not from a directly connected force pump. As a system gravity fed water is cheaper and more controllable. Most of the system runs at low pressure, up to about 10bar.

                                                      Pressured systems are typical of heating systems and Hydraulic systems like power steering and road diggers. In a hydraulic system small pipes are used to transfer energy as high-pressure water. The high-pressure is easily produced by a force pump, and the relative movement of different diameter pistons can be exploited to multiply force at the expense of movement or vice versa. The small pump on my Hydraulic engine crane allows me to lift a 1/3rd ton lathe with no trouble at all. Hydraulic systems run at much higher pressures, say 500 or 600 bar. The very high water pressure available from a simple force pump – little more than a lever operated ram in a plain cylinder – is excellent for testing boilers. Although the pressure is much higher than that produced by steam, there is very little energy stored in it. If a water pressured boiler gives way, it won't explode.

                                                      Testing a boiler by pressurising a gas is very dangerous because gas acts like a spring. If the boiler breaks, it could well explode because compressed gas contains stored energy that can be released almost instantaneously.

                                                      Gases and liquids follow the same basic rules, but the compressibility of gases cause considerable side effects compared with liquids. But designing a ship's propeller is much the same mathematically (I'm told) as designing an air-screw. They're not interchangeable though – large bladed ship propellers turn slowly in a thick fluid, while slim aircraft propellers spin fast in a thin fluid. Propellers have to be optimised to the working fluid.

                                                      Dave

                                                       

                                                       

                                                      Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 11/12/2019 15:24:49

                                                    Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 31 total)
                                                    • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                                                    Advert

                                                    Latest Replies

                                                    Home Forums Locomotives Topics

                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                                                    View full reply list.

                                                    Advert

                                                    Newsletter Sign-up