Posted by Bazyle on 16/12/2022 17:59:51:
Coke is what people with coal burners are encouraged to use now as it burns 'cleaner' ie less sulphur. With the greenies thinking that steel spontaneously appears without use of blast furnaces coke may become less available.
I mean, they would be right about that:
1) there are now techniques for producing steel which are reaching the point of commercial readiness which use direct hydrogen reduction of ores, at reduced temperatures to produce iron suitable as a feedstock for secondary steelmaking in an EAF; this doesn't require a blast furnace, and uses a lot less energy and raw materials.
2) blast furnaces produce pig iron, not steel,
and
3) blast furnaces don't need coke, they require a fuel which will yield a source of carbon (to produce CO) and heat.
Nippon Steel in Japan has several "Direct Melting System" plants which combine Gassification of municipal waste with primary steelmaking, using black-bag waste instead of coke, they have been doing so since 1979.
The Indians too have experimented with various types of Bio-Char and Waste products as alternative blast furnace fuels to some success.
Interestingly waste tyres would be a shoe-in for it that kind of thing, were it not from the sulphur from vulcanising adversely affecting the pig-iron and driving up the cost of subsequent BOF steelmaking steps…
Which is the exact same reason that British Steel gave for being unable to use the coal from the proposed mine to which you're alluding at their Scunthope plant; whilst Tata is threatening to close Port Talbot entirely.