As far as I know there are no formal laws in the UK controlling how a purely private club receiving no financial help from taxes or other external revenue, may be wound up.
However it is normal for a club to state that on dissolution any remaining assets shall be applied to the hobby, for example by donations to neighbouring clubs, or to charity.
The principle is that no members may gain financially. If the dying club sells its equipment to individuals, the cash raised should still be accounted for, and after settling outstanding invoices & debts, applied to or towards the club's interest generally.
I have never heard of an "asset lock" and it may something invented by the Covid legislation. Otherwise, a society should have a Dissolution rule, most do, and it is generally pretty much as Perko describes.
Brian –
I would suggest that your society adopts a Dissolution Clause similar to Perko's example; but establish exactly what "Asset Lock" means. What he quotes is near enough verbatim as in clubs to which I belong, but all those preface that with a club lifetime rule to prevent private gains while it exists.
I suggest you propose something like this, which I copied from the Wessex Cave Club, but it's pretty well standard. Replace the xxxx part (hobby-specific) with, e.g., " model- and associated amateur engineering " :
5.3.No part of the Club's funds shall at any time be distributed by gift, division or bonus in money, to or between any of its members.
5.4.On dissolution, surplus funds shall be applied in or towards the advancement of xxxxxx, or any of them.
5.5.No person or Committee shall have the authority to pledge any future income of the Club unless it has been authorised by a general meeting of the Club
How you do it depends how your Club operates, but as matter of principle such a rule is normally a General Meeting matter, and all members need be appraised of the proposal in the due notice period given by your club rules. A physical General Meeting is not presently possible, and you may need consider members who are not on the Internet let alone use Zoom. So, if pressed for time you might circulate everyone with the Proposal (signed, the Committee) and a postal ballot form – Yes, No, Abstain.
'
Regarding charities, I am very dubious about that route. On or two of my clubs are PLCs, having to file annual Returns to Companies House. I do not know what if any advantage there is in being a charity – commonality of practice is not recommendation, and free lunches do not exist. Don't think of the present, but of future, hazards.
The following illustrates that general point about unintended consequences, although the specific example is not likely to cover model-engineering societies.
My other caving-club had been enticed by promised tax advantages into becoming an HMRC-registered "Community Assisted Sports Club". This mainly meant membership open to all having that particular interest – as ours already was. HMRC waited a year, then pounced. It gave every CASC a narrow escape-period after which it CASC status would be irreversible and enforce internal record-keeping designed to prevent fraud, but impracticable and intrusive at the level required. With that, and no guarantee of no further regulation, a General Meeting voted our escape.
'