On
8 July 2025 at 09:38 Macolm Said:
Just a general comment that any widely used software actively developed in response to users will appear complicated. …
Well, backup/recovery is complicated! The user has to decide what needs to be backed up, how often, and what to. Backing-up the operating system and installed software is different from backing up user files. Don’t muddle the two! “What to” could be a local disc, or a memory stick, or another machine at home, or the cloud. They all have issues. For example, when backing up to the cloud it pays to encrypt (in case the cloud provider is hacked), and to compress the data to get it across the network pronto. At home, probably best not to encrypt because it’s something else to go wrong. I feel the same about compression. And then we’re into full vs differential vs incremental backups. Any software has to cover a lot of options ranging from trivially easy up to OMG complicated!
In a home system there’s much to be said in favour of keeping it simple: manually copy important user files in full, and keep a paper logbook. Easy to understand and recovery is straightforward.
But too simple is dangerous. Not thinking it through increases the chance that something important is missed. The risk is low on a singleton PC, but some home systems are very advanced: anyone operating a NAS or a shared service should plan backups carefully.
Failing to consider and test recovery can be painful. Recovery is when we discover we can’t find a particular file, or the backup was incomplete, or is full of crud, or the media is in a muddle, or was lost in the same fire! Or a technical problem: on a memory stick, the maximum size of a FAT32 file is 4Gb and the maximum size of a FAT32 partition is 32Gb. These limits are easily exceeded when archiving photos, videos and music. Neglecting the recovery problem, taking a “worry about it if it happens” approach, causes a lot of issues.
Woe, woe and thrice woe. This thread caused me to check my system, and it’s broken! Sad story: the computer was bought in May 2021, files were copied from the old machine, and, after confirming all was well, a full backup was taken, and an automated incremental backup started. The software is duplicity, based on rsync. Looking at the disc, I see backups were taken correctly until I upgraded Linux a month later. Looks like upgrading the operating system disabled the automated incremental backup,. As I didn’t notice, no backups taken for 4 years! Moral of the story: double check! Backups aren’t “fire and forget”.
I have to rethink what to do next. When my laptop failed a few months ago, I found it’s backup contained 1.2Gb of unwanted junk and only about 50Mb of worthwhile data. For simplicity I’d chosen to backup application files as well as user data. Not smart, because mixing the two complicated recovery and triggered a time consuming tidy up.
rsync is technically better than FreeFileSync, but it’s UNIX command line software, not as easy to drive as a GUI app, and tricky to set up on Windows. Though FreeFileSync is fine for most purposes, advanced users should check the details. There are many alternatives and they’re not all equally good at everything.
Dave