Listen to 'er with the Master's Degree in Advanced Domestic Management and never question her judgment on related matters. Been there. Done that.

Aldi tablets always did* the job for us just as well as premium brands, and we found the same applies to washing powder. Regardless of what dishwasher tablets or powder you use, I would suggest washing glasses by hand unless you really like the etched glass look.

*We got rid of the machine a while back – it took so long to build up a full load that it was spending most of its time as a cupboard for dirty plates. Funny thing is that after 30 years with dishwashers, I discovered I don't mind washing up...

Brian

I believe that Which? regularly rate Aldi tablets best.

Paul I would suggest that if they corrode aluminium then they contain soda

Roy

+1 for Aldi tablets, cant see difference with expensive ones.

Martin P

We live in an uncertain world and it's all too tempting to seek security from an established brand-name or high-prices. This is based on the false assumption that these attributes guarantee quality, which they don't. It's equally untrue that unbranded cheap items must be crap.

Whilst there's a loose link between 'quality' and cost, and between 'quality' and brand-names the quality of the link is dubious. Is the original reason for accepting a brand-name still valid?

Brand-names rise and fall like empires. They might start by representing the best on the market and reappear decades later as a label on cheap tat. Or it might start as cheap tat and rise to become top of the range. Brand-names are bought and sold; they don't necessarily represent the original owner, or country, or even product. I own a Polaroid CD-Player. Marconi (British) only survives as a brand-name belonging to Ericsson (Swedish). Brand-names are unstable.

As technology improves, prices generally drop, especially when mass-production can be applied and there is a large market. Once upon a time making steel was difficult, high-skill and time consuming. In particular, the more work put in, the better would be the product; therefore the best steel was expensive. The process was considered magic and some locations mysteriously produced superior metal, while others failed. Brand-names and regions were trustworthy.

By the end of the 19th century, the chemistry and physics of steel were much better understood. The evil effects of Sulphur and Phosphorous in ore and coal; the effect of different concentrations of Carbon; the positive effects of Molybdenum, Manganese and Tungsten. How to measure how much of each was in the melt, and how to remove or add them. Then the efficient Bessemer process made quantity production of mild-steel dirt cheap.

Now, there is nothing special about most steel. Given suitable plant, it can be made anywhere. The big issue making structural steel isn't technology or skill, rather because big is efficient several square kilometres of cheap land near  the raw materials are needed. As the materials are heavy and bulky, the plant will be far more economic if coal, iron-ore and limestone are all local. A serious problem is the plant also requires large quantities of fresh water. Because the output is itself heavy, the ideal steel works would be in a sea-port, and it doesn't matter where it is or who operates it provided it makes a profit.

Today, the link between brand-names and quality is mostly broken for almost all manufactured items. Most small cars are similar, however they are badged. There are exceptions: high-performance steels are made in small quantities by electrical processes, and these are still best bought from specialist makers.

Brand-name turbulence is most obvious with high technology: not long ago buying a mobile-phone from Nokia was a very safe bet. The firm failed to maintain momentum, and now there are superior alternatives.

I suggest it's never sensible to buy products simply because they have a recognised name and are reassuringly expensive. It's always worth checking. More important, I think, is buying from a source who will stand by the product in the event it's a dud. Worth trying cheaper alternatives; if Aldi dishwasher tablets do the job, why not? My mother-in-law worked in a factory making food items. The only difference between the expensive version sold by a 'quality' shop and the ordinary super-market brand was the packaging…

Dave

Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 30/03/2019 10:48:43

"Tinier than empires and more quick" (apologies to Andrew Marvell) I think.

I can remember when Mitutoyo were regarded as up-and-coming cheapies.

I can think of quite a few brands that started off that way and are now regarded as the bees' knees, but it's much harder to think of a once top-class brand that's now languishing at the downmarket end – usually decline is quickly followed by termination. Ah, your Nokia example might be a candidate.

Lidl sell a brand (maybe an own-brand) of cleaning stuff called W5, and their dishwasher tabs have worked well enough for us for a few years now. I can't remember the exact price, but it's not very much for 40-off.

Edited By Mick B1 on 30/03/2019 14:07:22

Definitely, it has 'Ford' embossed inside the fuel filler 'flap' !!

I used to own a Landrover Discovery '3' it had a 2.7 litre V6 engine made by Ford, the gear box was German, and most of the electrical stuff was made in Slovakia or Poland – but . . . it was marketed as a British thoroughbred vehicle !

And the 'van' story – Fiat make the Ducato (familiar to most motor home users) which is also sold as the Peugeot Boxer and Citroen Relay – only the badges are different !

So, going back to dishwasher tablets they are probably all made in a factory in China, next door to the one that makes all the mini lathes for all I know !!

Just make sure they have built in salt and rinse aid. Some very cheap ones are just detergent.

The Aldi/Lidl ones are as good as Finish IMHO.

Still worth adding salt unless you have very soft water.

| So mostly washing soda,

If I run out of tabs, I just put washing soda in the dispenser.

Neil

…but why use tablets? That way, you use the amount the tablet manufacturer decrees, irrespective of the greasiness, etc, of the washing up. Use powder, and you can not only use less than the manufacturer recommends, but even reduce that if there's nothing too greasy in there. Tested by experiment over a number of years…

We are in a very soft water area, so no salt needed, and the machine uses rinse aid but fairly sparingly.

Reminds me of the Calgon nonsense – compare its constituents with those of a typical washing powder. You are just adding more of the same.